The role of prosecutorial independence and prosecutorial accountability in domestic human rights trials

A prosecutorial organ is always in charge of the investigation and prosecution of crime, which makes this institution a key gatekeeper to the courts. Empowered with prosecutorial discretion, a prosecutorial organ dictates what, when, and whom to prosecute. The institutional design of the prosecutorial organ varies across time and across countries, which raises an important, yet quite understudied question: Does institutional design matter for how states respond to human rights violations and, if so, how? In this article, I develop a theoretical framework that highlights the importance of prosecutorial independence and prosecutorial accountability. I argue that understanding the factors that impact the use of prosecutorial discretion in human rights cases can potentially provide a more complete understanding of why and when states fail to investigate, to prosecute, and to punish human rights violations committed by state agents.     

Acute arsenic poisoning: clinical, toxicological, histopathological, and forensic features

This report describes a suicide case by acute arsenic intoxication via intravenous injection. A 30-year-old woman injected arsenic As (V) (sodium arseniate disodique: Disodium Hydrogena Arsenik RP) in a successful suicide attempt. Three hours following administration, the woman developed severe digestive symptoms. She was admitted to a hospital and transferred to the intensive care unit within 12 h of the massive administration of arsenic. Despite therapeutic efforts, over the next 2 h she developed multiorgan failure and died. A postmortem examination was performed. Pulmonary edema and congestion of liver were apparent. As (V) and As (III) were determined by high performance liquid chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry after mineralization of samples by concentrated nitric acid. Toxicological analysis revealed high concentrations of arsenic in biological fluids as well as in organs. Histopathological examination showed a typical indication of myocarditis. These findings were in agreement with acute arsenic poisoning. The symptoms developed by this young woman (intoxication by intravenous administration) were comparable to oral intoxication. The clinical signs, survival time, and administration type are discussed in light of the literature on acute and chronic arsenic poisoning.     

Laryngeal teflonoma identified by Fourier-transform infrared microspectroscopy after forensic autopsy: an interesting tool for foreign material identification in forensic cases

Forensic pathologists are sometimes confronted with microscopic foreign bodies mixed in with soft tissues surrounding wounds and which are thus difficult to identify. This identification, however, could be primordial in investigating a crime and in determining the weapon used. A case of a fatal respiratory distress syndrome due to conjoining suicidal drug intoxication and laryngeal obstruction by a voluminous foreign body giant cell granuloma is presented. The classical histological examination showed exogenous particles in the vocal cord tumor with birefringent qualities. Their analysis with Fourier-Transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry coupled with infrared microscope allows the determination of their chemical nature as polytetrafluoroethylene and to the diagnosis of teflonoma. This case report put the emphasis on the forensic interest of the FTIR imaging.     

La répartition du pouvoir de. décision dans ľadministration pubhque: ľapport de la théone de ľorganisation

Sommaire. Dans une première partie, cet article donne un compte rendu des différents concepts reliés au problème de la répartition du pouvoir de décision dans les organisations. ?auteur distingue trois niveaux: la répartition du pouvoir de décision dans les systèmes ?organisations; la répartition du pouvoir de décision au sein ?une organisation; et la participation des employés et des usagers à la prise de décision. La seconde partie discute du degré de centralisation du pouvoir de décision dans ?administration publique. On y traite du pouvoir des organismes gouvernementaux, de la délégation du pouvoir de décision dans les administrations publiques et de ?autonomie des employés. En conclusion, ?auteur discute de la nécessité de décentraliser la prise de décision dans ?administration publique et des conditions nécessaires au succès ?une telle expérience. Abstract. The first part of this paper reviews the many concepts related to the problem of the distribution of decision-making power in organizations. The author distinguishes three levels of analysis: the distribution of decision-making power in systems of organizations; the distribution of decision-making power within an organization; and the participation of employees and clients in the decision-making process. The second part addresses the question of the degree of centralization of decision-making power in the public sector. The author focuses on three aspects: the power of governmental organizations, the delegation of decisionmaking authority in public organizations, and the employees' autonomy. In conclusion, the author discusses the necessity to decentralize the decisionmaking process in the public sector and reviews the conditions under which such an experience could be successful.