Geisinger Medical Center and the Geisinger Health Plan: the rural HMO

The Geisinger Health Plan (GHP) in Danville, Pennsylvania represents one of the nation's first rural health maintenance organizations. Opened in the Geisinger Medical Center in 1972, this hospital-based, multi-specialty group practice today provides comprehensive care to an enrolled population of 6,000 members in Montour County. Cost and utilization statistics for GHP compare favorably with other HMO settings.     

history as narration: resistance and subaltern subjectivity in Micaela Bastidas’ ‘confession’

This paper focusses on the negotiations in which many subaltern peoples engage within contexts of unequal power relations in colonial settings like eighteenth-century Peru. The trial and ‘confession’ of Micaela Bastidas, an indigenous mestiza and wife of the Inca rebel Túpac Amaru II, allows for an analysis of the complexity of her subjectivity and agency, both as products of colonial impositions and Andean notions of gender complementarity and power. As a woman, wife of a noble curaca and member of a conquered indigenous population, she defied rigidly bipolar colonial ethnic and gender norms. Skilfully engaging in ‘rituals of subordination’ through the manipulation of discriminatory colonial expectations, Micaela refused to share what was expected of her, subverting colonial gender and power hierarchies, albeit momentarily.     

Faking performance together: systems of performance evaluation in Russian enforcement agencies and production of bias and privilege

A specialist on Russian law enforcement examines a critical source of prosecution and conviction bias in that country – the system by which prosecutors, police, judges, and other legal professionals are evaluated. More specifically, she demonstrates how that system (exclusive of any inherent corruption or bias) institutionalizes incentives for the prosecution of large numbers of defendants in routine cases for the purpose of meeting informal quotas. Officials from a variety of law enforcement agencies, seeking to “hit their numbers,” develop techniques of selecting the “right” cases (and avoiding “wrong” ones), manipulating charges depending on the victim's and defendant's statuses.     

Longitudinal Associations between Coping Strategies and Psychopathology in Pre-adolescence

Journal of Youth and Adolescence - Much of the literature investigating the association between coping and psychopathology is cross-sectional, or associations have been investigated in a...     

MY REPLY TO PERLSTEIN AND TAYLOR

Gary Ackerman, the author of “Beyond Arson? A Threat Assessment of the Earth Liberation Front” (Terrorism and Political Violence, 15(4)), replies to the critiques of his article by Gary Perlstein and Bron Taylor. The reply addresses several points raised in the critiques, including issues of bias and the applicability of the methodology of threat assessments to radical environmentalist groups. It also places the threat assessment in a broader historical context, comparing the evolution of the Earth Liberation Front to that of several other radical groups.     

“Tort Tales” and TV Judges: Amplifying,Modifying, or Countering the Antitort Narrative?

This article joins the debate about the popular pervasiveness of antitort and antilitigation attitudes by examining whether, and to what extent, antitort or antilitigation sentiment is present in the narratives about law offered by reality‐based television judge shows. Given the persistent debate about tort reform and scholars' recognition of the role played in this debate by simplified narratives about the legal system, we analyze whether reality‐based TV judge shows as a genre contribute to the creation and dissemination antitort and antilitigation sentiment. Earlier studies led us to hypothesize that TV judge shows would largely support the antitort and antilitigation narratives. After coding over 55 hours of such shows, however, we conclude that they do not adopt this narrative. Rather, these shows present a view of the civil law system that largely treats plaintiffs' claims as legitimate and showcases the majority of defendants as wrongdoers. In spite of this, we argue that the particular dramatic qualities of TV judge shows limit their potential to serve as a strong counternarrative to antitort and antilitigation stories.