全文获取类型
收费全文 | 335篇 |
免费 | 9篇 |
专业分类
各国政治 | 36篇 |
工人农民 | 3篇 |
世界政治 | 51篇 |
外交国际关系 | 3篇 |
法律 | 163篇 |
中国政治 | 4篇 |
政治理论 | 83篇 |
综合类 | 1篇 |
出版年
2019年 | 2篇 |
2018年 | 3篇 |
2015年 | 5篇 |
2014年 | 5篇 |
2013年 | 26篇 |
2012年 | 9篇 |
2011年 | 16篇 |
2010年 | 15篇 |
2009年 | 16篇 |
2008年 | 18篇 |
2007年 | 11篇 |
2006年 | 14篇 |
2005年 | 19篇 |
2004年 | 10篇 |
2003年 | 8篇 |
2002年 | 5篇 |
2001年 | 2篇 |
2000年 | 3篇 |
1999年 | 6篇 |
1998年 | 2篇 |
1997年 | 4篇 |
1996年 | 6篇 |
1995年 | 3篇 |
1994年 | 4篇 |
1993年 | 8篇 |
1992年 | 2篇 |
1991年 | 7篇 |
1990年 | 8篇 |
1989年 | 8篇 |
1988年 | 2篇 |
1987年 | 4篇 |
1986年 | 7篇 |
1985年 | 9篇 |
1984年 | 4篇 |
1983年 | 5篇 |
1982年 | 4篇 |
1981年 | 11篇 |
1980年 | 5篇 |
1979年 | 5篇 |
1978年 | 6篇 |
1976年 | 8篇 |
1975年 | 2篇 |
1974年 | 3篇 |
1972年 | 2篇 |
1969年 | 3篇 |
1968年 | 3篇 |
1967年 | 2篇 |
1964年 | 2篇 |
1963年 | 2篇 |
1959年 | 2篇 |
排序方式: 共有344条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
201.
202.
A meta‐analysis was performed to quantify the association between antisocial behavior (ASB) and performance on neuropsychological executive functioning (EF) measures. This meta‐analysis built on Morgan and Lilienfeld's (2000) meta‐analysis of the same topic by including recently published studies and by examining a wider range of EF measures. A total of 126 studies involving 14,786 participants were included in the analyses. Antisocial groups performed significantly worse on measures of EF compared with controls, with a grand mean effect size of d= .44. Significant variation occurred in the magnitude of effect sizes calculated across studies. The largest effect sizes were found for criminality (d= .61) and externalizing behavior disorder (d= .54) ASB groups, whereas the smallest effect sizes were found for antisocial personality disorder (d= .19) groups. Larger differences in EF performance were observed across studies involving participants from correctional settings and with comorbid attention deficit and hyperactivity problems. Overall, the results indicated that a robust association exists between ASB and poor EF that held across studies with varied methodological approaches. The methodological issues in the research literature and the implications of the meta‐analysis results are discussed, and the directions for future research are proposed. 相似文献
203.
JAMES A.DORN 《北京周报(英文版)》2011,(44):15
<正>Presidential candidates look to score points with voters by blaming China for the slow economy The passage of the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act by the U.S.Senate,which penalizes China for its fundamentally misaligned currency, 相似文献
204.
205.
206.
207.
208.
209.
210.
The Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition government has committed itself to a Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDR) in 2010. The government and the country face very hard choices to bring United Kingdom defence and security policy back from the brink of bankruptcy—both financial and strategic (Gow). To succeed, it must overcome the failings of the past (Chisnall, Dorman, Rees) and take a truly open and radical look at all aspects of policy and process—including the Trident independent nuclear deterrent (Allen), relations with Europe (Witney) and the importance of cyber‐issues in the future security context (Fisher). It must get strategic concepts right to provide flexibility with credibility (Stone). It must deliver ‘what the military wants’: true strategic prioritisation, radical defence acquisition reform, and credible balancing of resources and commitments (Kiszley). The scale of the challenge facing the United Kingdom in—and beyond—the 2010 SDR is why The Political Quarterly convened a workshop early in 2010 involving MPs, practitioners, retired military personnel, journalists, commentators, business people and academics, and publishes these associated papers. Most of all, to overcome the failings of the past, there must be a radical move beyond the welcome first steps of the Cameron–Clegg government to introduce a National Security Council and a National Security Advisor, to reconfigure relationships within government, across departments and with Parliament to have a government figure of accountability and responsibility—a Secretary of State for Security Policy, primus inter pares with other Secretaries of State—to make sense of the questions needing to be asked and answered (Gearson and Gow). 相似文献