排序方式: 共有33条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
31.
The Intensive Agriculture Districts Programme (IA DP) was a major component of the Indian Government's desire to launch a ‘new strategy’ for agricultural development in the nineteen‐sixties. Prior evaluations have been incomplete and flawed by an inappropriate interpretation of the evidence. This paper utilizes more recent data and uses the total factor productivity approach to evaluate gains from the programme. A feature of the analysis is the concept of ‘economic slack1 existing in these districts at the beginning of the programme. It concludes that the programme induced a very significant increase in the use of ‘modem’ inputs and hence of agricultural production but did not result in a major gain in ‘real’ total factor productivity. 相似文献
32.
John Mohan 《Political studies》1998,46(2):309-327
The paper considers the relationships between the uneven development of the British economy, the political strategies pursued by the Conservative government, and the changes to the character of the NHS in the 1980s which culminated in the NHS reforms. It describes the context in which spatial resource allocation policies in the NHS were operating—one of heightened uneven development, with particularly rapid growth taking place in South East England with harmful effects on the NHS. It shows that one response was pressure by backbench MPs on government for a more equitable distribution of funds. Developments within the NHS are interpreted as strategic attempts to prioritize the interests of key geographical locations within a broader 'two nations' political strategy. Three issues are raised: the usefulness of the idea of 'spatial coalitions' in understanding pressures for change in health care policy; the extent to which spatially-uneven development and the 'two-nations' political strategy influenced the character and timing of changes in health care policy; and the possibility that the politics of the welfare state will increasingly be shaped by territorially-based conflicts. 相似文献
33.
This study utilises eight alternative measures of institutions and the instrumental variable method to examine the impacts of institutions on poverty. The estimates show that an economy with a robust system to control corruption, an effective government, and a stable political system will create the conditions to promote economic growth, minimise income distribution conflicts, and reduce poverty. Corruption, ineffective governments, and political instability will not only hurt income levels through market inefficiencies, but also escalate poverty incidence via increased income inequality. The results also imply that the quality of the regulatory system, rule of law, voice and accountability, and expropriation risk are inversely related to poverty but their effect on poverty is via average income rather than income distribution. 相似文献