A critical evaluation of two methods of signature analysis.

The assessment of signature disguise, where an individual attempts to disguise their own signature on a document with the intent of later disclaiming it (so-called 'view to deny' signatures), is a problem faced by many document examiners. This study evaluates a method known as the angle value test and another experimental method involving angle measurements to determine if either of them can reliably establish whether a questioned signature is disguised or has been written by another person. By using 29 sets of normal and disguised signatures, both methods of analysis were shown to be unreliable techniques for identifying the author of a particular signature.     

韩国、日本社会保障发展历程中的制度安排与变迁

一、制度安排与变迁内生变量:制度需求1.现代社会对社会保障制度的天然需求制度是一个社会博弈规则,更正式地说是人们制定的规范人们相互关系的约束条件,是达到某种均衡的机制。青木昌彦认为制度可以概括为一种博弈均衡,是有限理性和具有反思能力的个体构成的社会长期经验的产物。制度安排是管束特定行动模型和关系的一套行为规则,社会保障制度通常被认为是正式的制度安排。任何制度安排经济和安全两个基本目的。因此制度可以设计成人类对付不确定性和增加个人效用的手段。在现代社会里,由于失业、贫困、疾病等社会与自然风险因素的存在与恶…     

Female homicide-suicide perpetrators: a controlled study

The record files of the Dade County Medical Examiner Department were reviewed and 133 homicide-suicides were identified. Of these, ten (or 7.5%) were female perpetrated. The chart data of these 10 female homicide-suicide perpetrators, chart data of 50 female homicide-suicide victims, and 50 female individual suicides systematically selected as controls were tabulated using a standardized instrument. The results were analyzed for differences using simple statistical methods. The comparisons revealed that female homicide-suicide perpetrators were more likely than female homicide-suicide victims to live in mobile homes, kill their lover or ex-lover, have their crime accidentally discovered, leave a suicide note, kill on a weekend, and be depressed, but are less likely than female homicide-suicide victims to live with a spouse. Additionally, female homicide-suicide perpetrators were more likely than individual female suicides to live in mobile homes but less likely to live alone and to be depressed.     

Intervention for Abusive Fathers: Promising Practices in Court and Community Responses

Fathers who have abused their children or their children's mothers constitute a significant challenge to court and community service providers. Although legislation offers direction for court dispositions, resulting court orders are only the starting point for ensuring children's safety. This article begins with a rationale for expanding services to include intervention for abusive fathers. Using the Caring Dads program as an example, we identify four principles to guide appropriate intervention with abusive fathers and discuss their theoretical and practical implications. Throughout the article we contrast the model we are proposing with more traditional court and intervention program responses to abusive fathers.     

A comparison of mothers of adolescent incest vs. non-incest perpetrators

One hundred and thirty mothers of adolescent sexual perpetrators were interviewed. Mothers of incest perpetrators (n = 48) were compared to mothers of non-incest perpetrators (n = 82). Results indicated that significantly more mothers of incest perpetrators reported having been physically and sexually abused, having a sexual dysfunction, and having been in prior psychotherapy. With regard to their sons, a higher percentage of mothers of incest perpetrators reported that they believed their son had committed the sexual offense, was in need of treatment, and had a history of being physically abused. Additionally, a significantly lower percentage of incest perpetrators had involvement with the juvenile justice system.     

Questioning Fundamentals: Leyland Daf and the 'Ownership' of Charged Property

Forward Links to Citing Articles

Retraction . Modern Law Review 67: 6, 1046‐1046 .
Online publication date: 1‐Oct‐2004. Although the House of Lords decision in Leyland Daf was primarily concerned with the order for distribution of assets in a winding‐up, it has several other far‐reaching ramifications and repercussions. The reasoning of their Lordships in the case alters our understanding of the very nature and operation of a charge over a company's assets. This reasoning strikes at the heart of the law of security interests, bringing into question the fundamental distinction between a charge and a mortgage. Furthermore the decision has given a whole new complexion to the concept of a floating charge which will have tremendous consequences for its application in commercial practice. This paper analyses the decision firstly on the basis of its legal principle and then on the basis of its policy considerations and concludes that its reasoning is neither sound nor justifiable on either ground.