The development of an automatic recognition system for earmark and earprint comparisons

The value of earmarks as an efficient means of personal identification is still subject to debate. It has been argued that the field is lacking a firm systematic and structured data basis to help practitioners to form their conclusions. Typically, there is a paucity of research guiding as to the selectivity of the features used in the comparison process between an earmark and reference earprints taken from an individual. This study proposes a system for the automatic comparison of earprints and earmarks, operating without any manual extraction of key-points or manual annotations. For each donor, a model is created using multiple reference prints, hence capturing the donor within source variability. For each comparison between a mark and a model, images are automatically aligned and a proximity score, based on a normalized 2D correlation coefficient, is calculated. Appropriate use of this score allows deriving a likelihood ratio that can be explored under known state of affairs (both in cases where it is known that the mark has been left by the donor that gave the model and conversely in cases when it is established that the mark originates from a different source). To assess the system performance, a first dataset containing 1229 donors elaborated during the FearID research project was used. Based on these data, for mark-to-print comparisons, the system performed with an equal error rate (EER) of 2.3% and about 88% of marks are found in the first 3 positions of a hitlist. When performing print-to-print transactions, results show an equal error rate of 0.5%. The system was then tested using real-case data obtained from police forces.     

Betriebsanlagengenehmigung,Gutachten

Sachverst?ndigengutachten aus den Jahren 1999 bzw 2002 k?nnen für die Beurteilung der Genehmigungsf?higkeit einer Betriebsanlage im Jahre 2011 keine taugliche Grundlage bilden. Der zum Beweis des Vorliegens der Genehmigungsvoraussetzungen des § 77 GewO 1994 herangezogene Sachverst?ndige kann seiner Beurteilung vom Konsenswerber vorgelegte Messberichte zu Grunde legen, sofern er diese nach eigenverantwortlicher überprüfung für unbedenklich h?lt.     

Bescheidverkündung nur unmittelbar nach Verhandlung zulässig

Aus § 67g Abs 2 Z 2 AVG folgt, dass die mündliche Verkündung eines Bescheides überhaupt zu entfallen hat, wenn dieser nicht unmittelbar im Anschluss an die mündliche Verhandlung beschlossen werden kann. Eine entgegen § 67g Abs 2 AVG erfolgte mündliche "Verkündung" des Bescheides ist unwirksam, sodass der Bescheid durch die Zustellung der schriftlichen Ausfertigung zu erlassen ist. Eine solche Verkündung unterbricht nicht die Verj?hrung.     

Intimate partner homicide,immigration and citizenship: evidence from Norway 1990–2012

Intimate partner homicides (IPH) are fatal violent attacks perpetrated by intimate partners. Immigrants are overrepresented in the IPH statistics as both perpetrators and victims. If explanatory factors for this are not studied, immigrants may be stigmatized. The present study investigates whether IPHs committed by immigrant perpetrators have characteristics that differentiate them from IPHs committed by the native majority of IPH perpetrators. All IPHs in Norway from 1990 to 2012 (N = 177) were included. Quantitative data were extracted through structured investigation of court documents. Information concerning risk factors (previous intimate partner violence and sociodemographic, contextual and clinical factors) was drawn from three validated risk assessment instruments. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. When adjusted for other group differences, very few differences remained in the multivariate models. IPHs perpetrated by immigrants differed from cases with native perpetrators on modus operandi and ascribed motives and resulted in longer sentences than IPHs with native perpetrators. This study indicates considerable similarities in IPHs perpetrated by immigrants and natives. Findings indicating that IPHs by immigrants were perceived differently in the justice system need further investigation.