杆状病毒表达的猪传染性胃肠炎病毒钉状糖蛋白在其血清学诊断上的应用

利用从猪传染性胃肠炎病毒（ＴＧＥＶ）Ｍｉｌｅｒ株（Ｍ５Ｃ）克隆建立的一株重组杆状病毒（Ｒ２－２）表达的重组ＴＧＥＶ钉状糖蛋白（Ｓ），建立了一种阻断酶联免疫吸附试验（ＥＬＩＳＡ）来检测猪群抗ＴＧＥＶ抗体。试验表明，用重组病毒Ｒ２－２接种ｓｆ９细胞（ｓｐｏｄｏｐｔｅｒａｆｒｕｇｉｐｅｒｄａ）所表达的重组蛋白量在接种后第７２ｈ达到最高值；该重组蛋白能与抗ＴＧＥＶＳ蛋白Ａ位点的单克隆抗体特异性结合。用阻断ＥＬＩＳＡ检测６８份来自无ＴＧＥＶ感染或ＴＧＥＶ（Ｐｕｒｄｕｅｌ５）免疫的仔猪或母猪血清，结果与ＴＧＥＶ蚀斑减数试验完全相符，灵敏度和特异性均为１００％。同时检测来自ＴＧＥＶ试验免疫猪、美国部分地区猪群、我国进口猪以及我国国内猪群血清６２７份，阳性检出率分别为８２．６１％、６１．６２％、５８．３３％和２９．１０％；用中和试验（微量中和试验或病毒蚀斑减数试验）检测的ＴＧＥ血清抗体阳性率分别为８０．８７％、５９．６０％、５６．１１％和３０．６０％，两种方法对抗ＴＧＥＶ抗体的检出率没有显著差异。     

Ironies of inclusion: social class and deinstitutionalization

This paper discusses changes in the social organization of mental institutionalization as they relate to developments in the wider social and economic environment. Despite dramatic changes in the system of inpatient psychiatric care during the last three decades, the historic division of labor between the private and the public system (with the latter treating the poor, the unemployed, and the nonwhite) has not ceased to exist. At the same time, under the influence of the postwar trend towards greater political integration of disadvantaged and marginal groups into society's central value systems, treatment of the mentally ill has become less segregated and more voluntary. An important implication of these two interacting trends--the changed legal position of the patient vis-à-vis the provider and the deteriorating economic position of the user of public psychiatric facilities--has been the exceeding irrelevance of one of the basic tenets of psychiatric care: that clinical treatment precedes social functioning. With two vignettes of chronic patients the article illustrates how symptoms and survival are fused in the contemporary, inclusionary system of care.     

A median-voter model of economic regulation

A basic median-voter model is developed and extended to analyze issues of economic regulation and public policy outcomes. The model is used to generate comparative static results relating changes in public-policy outcomes to changes in relative group sizes, total population, information costs, and population heterogeneity. The model is also used to explore the issue of optimal group size — the size of the special-interest group that maximizes the group's per capita public policy gains. Comparative static analysis reveals how optimal group size and gains per capita are affected by changes in population heterogeneity, the size of the total population, and relative knowledge levels.