Some facts and fantasies concerning local autonomy in the Metropolitan Toronto school system

Abstract. The Metropolitan Toronto school system is a unique form of educational governance in North America, as a two-tiered federation. Tension has always existed between the levels over which had the prerogative LO make binding decisions on issues without involvement, consultation, or ratification by the other. Recently, the area school boards, which constitute the lower level, have increasingly raised this issue, protesting that their local autonomy is being eroded. This paper describes the operationalization of the local autonomy concept and points out that it is dynamic, being dependent upon at least four factors: the nature of the issue being discussed, the political context of the issue, the nature of the deadlines related to the issue, and the particular blend of people involved at the time of operationalization. The paper further explores the nature and sources of infringement upon the autonomy of local school boards in the Metropolitan Toronto federation. It identifies and discusses three major sources: (a) from the provincial level, (b) from the Metro level, and (c) from other area boards. The paper concludes that perhaps the greatest threat to area board autonomy in a period of financial cutbacks is the other area boards themselves who are forced into competition for financial resources due to the fact that accepted bases for agreeing upon relative inter-board needs have not been fully developed. Sommaire. L'organisation scolaire du Toronto métropolitain est unique en Amérique du Nord. Etant composée de tension entre les deux niveaux car chacun cherche à prendre des décisions exécutoires sans consultation avec l'autre ou ratification de sa part. Récemment les commissions scolaires qui constituent le palier inférieur ont soulevé cette question, en se plaignant de plus en plus de l'drosion de leur autonomie locale. L'auteur de cet esposé décrit l'application pratique du concept de l'autonomie locale et fait remarquer qu'il est dynamique, car il dépend d'au moins quatre facteurs: la nature de la question à l'étude et son contexte politique, la nature des échéances qui s'y rapporte, et la composition du groupe participant à l'exercice. L'auteur étudie aussi la nature et les sources d'ingérence dans les affaires des commissions scolaires locales de la fédération du Toronto métropolitain. Il dégage et étudie trois sources principales: (a) le niveau provincial, (b) le niveau métropolitain, (c) les autres commissions scolaires. Il conclut que la plus grande menace pour l'autonomie des commissions scolaires en période d'austérité financiére provient sans doute des autres commissions scolaires car elles sont forcées de se faire concurrence entre elles pour obtenir des ressources financiéres. Cette concurrence est accrue de fait que les critères d'évaluation des besoins sont encore imprécis et ne font pas l'objet dun accord général.     

Rallying Votes? A Multilevel Approach to Understanding Voter Decision-Making in the 2016 Presidential Nominating Contests

The 2016 presidential nominating process presented the American public with an interesting and tumultuous set of contests. Despite the unique nature of both the Democratic and Republican contests, the candidates stuck to the usual campaign activities to help influence voters. However, one of these campaign tactics, campaign visits, has been vastly understudied. Using a uniquely compiled dataset and a hierarchical linear model, I am able to test how campaign effects, including visits, as well as an individual’s predispositions impacted vote choice in the 2016 presidential nominating contests. The results demonstrate that the 2016 presidential nominating contests were decided based on a combination of both campaign activities and individual-level predictors.