排序方式: 共有39条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
21.
Roger J. R. Levesque 《Journal of youth and adolescence》2007,36(4):375-389
The study of adolescence may have come of age, but it remains debatable whether research appropriately considers the ethnic
diversity of adolescence. Given a heightened interest in supporting a more inclusive approach to adolescent research, this
study takes stock of how seriously we actually are pursuing a more inclusive study of adolescence. To do so, this study examines
the extent to which six leading journals dedicated to the study of adolescence publish articles that include ethnic participants,
report the nature of that inclusion, and present findings that consider the ethnic dimensions of their samples. Although results
reveal some diversity among journals, trends do emerge. For example, the study of adolescence is quite international: overall,
more than 40% of 1283 empirical articles (published from 2000 to and including 2006) report findings from non-U.S. samples.
If we remove international studies from our analyses, we find that the vast majority of studies (93%) describe the ethnic
composition of their samples. That finding diverges considerably from reports from other fields of research. Also unlike other
fields of research, studies from journals on adolescence do tend to include ethnic groups. The majority (68%) of articles
actually do not have samples with a majority of participants from European American groups. Over 40% of articles present empirical
analyses relating to identified ethnic groups, and at least 19% present findings that focus on one ethnic group (rather than
comparing one to another). We do, however, find relatively ignored groups (such as Native and Asian Americans) and a tendency
to lump diverse groups into five dominant ethnic groups or into “other” groups. We place these findings in the context of
research on adolescence and explore their significance.
Roger J.R. Levesque is Professor of Criminal Justice, Indiana University. He is Editor of the Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 相似文献
22.
23.
24.
Roger J. R. Levesque 《Journal of youth and adolescence》2013,42(10):1497-1497
25.
26.
27.
28.
Piercing the Family's Private Veil: Family Violence, International Human Rights, and the Cross-Cultural Record 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Roger Levesque 《Law & policy》1999,21(2):161-187
International law does not take family violence seriously enough. Although reviews and commentaries of international law regularly ignore family violence, such violence increasingly becomes a central concern of modern international treaties and plans of action. This article details how international law, which still tends to limit itself to inter-state behavior, seeks to transform local cultural practices and forms of interpersonal relations that lead to family violence. Although these developments largely remain in their infancy, the article proposes that international human rights developments are both legitimate and necessary. 相似文献
29.
Public Choice - The amending formula of Canada's Constitution Act, 1982 is analysed and assessed, as are a variety of alternative formulae, some of which were actually proposed and then... 相似文献
30.
Roger J. R. Levesque 《Journal of youth and adolescence》2017,46(12):2401-2406
Data sharing has come of age. Long expected as a professional courtesy but rarely honored, data sharing is now highlighted in codes of ethics, supported by research communities, required by leading funding organizations, and variously encouraged and mandated by journals and even publishers. These developments reveal how sharing generates many benefits, all of which go to the integrity of the scientific process. Yet, sharing remains a complex phenomenon. This Editorial explains the journal’s response to the publisher’s mandate to establish an appropriate data sharing policy for the Journal of Youth and Adolescence. It describes the need to balance the benefits of sharing with its costs for authors publishing in multidisciplinary, developmental science journals like this one. For this journal and at this time, that balance leads us to err on the side of caution, which means supporting those who created their data and not coercing public sharing as a condition for publishing. This approach recognizes authors’ reliance on a wide variety of data, the needs of differentially situated authors, the requirements of robust peer review, and the potential harms that can come from editors’ unilateral sharing mandates. 相似文献