External quality assessment of laboratory performance in analysis of toxicological cases

A mean of 44 members of the United Kingdom national external quality assessment scheme (UKNEQAS) for toxicology reported analytical findings on 10 toxicological cases circulated between December 1995 and February 2000. Material distributed usually consisted of a 5ml blood and a 20ml urine sample simulated by quantitative addition of drugs and their metabolites to material donated by volunteers and patients. The samples were accompanied by a brief outline of the circumstances surrounding the case. Laboratories were requested to report their analytical findings, list methods of analysis, and provide interpretation of their findings. The mean overall success rate for identification of drugs or their pharmacological group was 76%, failure being largely by laboratories providing an immunoassay-based screening service for a fixed range of drug groups. The latter laboratories indicated that cases would be referred to regional toxicology centres for further investigation or confirmation. The coefficient of variation of measurements was <7% for routine analytes, such as ethanol and paracetamol, but 26-44% for tricyclics and opiates. There were 3% false positive reports. The quantity and content of interpretative comment provided by the laboratories was very variable. A number provide nothing in addition to the analytical result.     

The measurement of suicidal ideation

A four-item suicidal ideation subscale of the GHQ-28 has been used previously to assess suicidal ideation on the basis of its face validity. In order to further validate its use, this study compared scores on this scale with scores on a well-established suicidal intent scale. There was a significant correlation between scores of that subscale and the self-report component as well as the overall score of the suicidal intent scale, thereby confirming its validity in providing a standardized method for comparing suicidal ideation in different populations.