新时代国有企业党委发挥把方向、管大局、保落实作用研究

通过梳理党的二十大对国有企业党委发挥把方向、管大局、保落实作用的重要论述,阐述了国有企业党委发挥把方向、管大局、保落实作用的基本内涵,并分析了目前国有企业党委在把方向、管大局、保落实方面存在的主要问题。在此基础上,紧密结合企业实际,深入总结了辽阳石化公司党委在加强和改进企业党建、展现国企担当、贯彻新发展理念、推进高质量发展等方面把方向、管大局、保落实的具体实践经验。     

Rogers v. Whitaker

The High Court of Australia affirmed the Supreme Court of New South Wales' determination that a doctor has a duty to warn a patient of any material risk involved in a proposed treatment. A risk is considered material if a reasonable person in similar circumstances would attach significance to the risk, or if the doctor is, or should be, cognizant that the particular patient would express concern about the risk. The trial court overruled the precept that a doctor could not be found negligent in warning a patient if the doctor acted within the purview of common practice, even though other practitioners may follow different procedures and regardless of the particular patient's concerns. In this case, Maree Whitaker became essentially blind after an unsucessful operation on her right eye caused sympathetic ophthalmia in her left eye. Although there was no question that the surgery had been performed with the requisite skill and care, Ms. Whitaker petitioned the court for relief due to the failure of the ophthalmologist, Dr. Christopher Rogers, to warn her of the possibility (approximately 1 in 14,000) that the sympathetic ophthalmia condition could develop. The trial court's award of damages was affirmed because, in spite of Ms. Whitaker's expressed specific concern that her "good eye" not be harmed, Dr. Rogers did not inform her of the potential risks associated with the surgery.