我国非营利组织发展模式的设想与探讨

在过去 2 0年里 ,全球范围内的“结社革命”引起了人们极大的关注 ,中国怎样赶上这个潮流 ,发展非营利组织已经提上日程 ,文章从时间和空间两个方面 ,大胆设想了几种适合我国国情的发展模式 ,从宏观的角度出发构建了一套非营利组织发展系统 ,并且指出了当前我们发展非营利组织所遇到的问题和困难。     

Individual rationality and bargaining

We argue that Nash’s solution to the bargaining problem should be modified such that it will be based on a New Reference Point (NRP). Such a point is needed so that a player is not considered ‘individually rational’ if he accepts an agreement that provides him with a utility lower than the minimal utility he can derive from any Pareto optimal agreement, or if he accepts an agreement that provides him a utility lower than the one he can obtain by unilateral action. The employment of such NRP requires modifying two axioms and hence leads to a new proposed solution.     

网络言论自由的界限

网络言论是言论自由的一种主要表现方式,它具有不同于其他传播媒介的显著特点;网络言论自由的冲突主要表现在两方面:一是网络言论自由与公民权利的冲突;二是网络言论自由与公共管理的冲突;因此,对网络言论亟需进行必要的法律限制。     

和谐世界与国际秩序

国际旧秩序的弊端凸显建立和谐世界的必要性。建设和谐世界,必须改革不合理的国际旧秩序,建立公正合理的国际新秩序。构建和谐世界与建立国际新秩序是相辅相成、互为条件的,构建和谐世界是对建立国际新秩序的升华与发展。     

高校德育网站建设：理论支撑与效果保障

高校德育网站已经成为信息时代大学生思想政治教育的重要手段和载体。由于网络环境下大学生的行为表现出充分的自主性和自由性,因此高校德育网站要想发挥作用,首先应该提高自身对大学生的吸引力。在高校德育网站建设和网上德育过程中要以注意力选择原理为理论基础,并采取措施,提供外部保障,才能最大限度地提高吸引力,从而保证德育网站的有效性。     

试析法院院长引咎辞职制度

针对最高人民法院颁布的《地方各级人民法院及专门人民法院院长、副院长引咎辞职规定〈试行〉》的某些条款 ,本文认为 ,其中有一些欠妥之处。这些条款一方面与宪法和法律的有关规定抵触 ,另一方面违反了法治的基本原则 ,将会导致司法行政化和影响司法独立的实现。作为影响全国法院系统的司法改革的重要文件 ,如不予以指出 ,必然会妨碍中国法治建设的进程。     

浅析陕西人力资本投资与收益回报

随着社会的发展,人力资本投资对经济增长的贡献越来越大,国家的综合实力和国际竞争力将越来越取决于人力资本投资水平的高低。陕西经济社会发展水平落后于东部发达省份的原因之一就是陕西对人力资本的投资不足,企业和个人对人力资本投资的收益不高,从而导致陕西人力资本缺乏竞争力。研究陕西人力资本投资与收益问题,寻找提高各投资主体投资回报的现实途径具有十分重要的意义。     

Gender Equality on the Boards of EU Companies: Between Economic Efficiency,Fundamental Rights and Democratic Legitimisation of Economic Governance

Currently, there is a large gap between the proportion of employed and well‐educated women and those sitting on the boards of EU companies. This gap should be significantly diminished because it is mandated by the EU fundamental right of equality between women and men (Article 23 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights), and by the need for democratic legitimisation of the EU and of its economic governance (Articles 2 and 3(3) TEU). However, the Commission's proposal for a directive on improving the gender balance among non‐executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges does not constitute an appropriate legal solution for this problem because it infringes the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity. There are many other instruments than compulsory gender quotas that can be used by EU institutions to promote more gender‐balanced boards of EU companies. The potential of such measures has not been utilised yet in full.