论社区和谐与公共道德——基于社会和谐的微观视角

基于社会和谐的微观视角,和谐社区是和谐社会的微观载体,构建和谐社会必须依靠公众在社区治理中的主动参与和在公共生活中的道德自觉;公共道德是推动社区和谐的基本力量,而和谐的社区又可以孕育新的公民品质。主体多元、稳定有序、互惠互利、公平正义、共同维护等都可作为社区和谐公民治理模式的基本要素或理念;而普遍的道德公共理性(道德自觉)是社区和谐与不和谐的根本区别所在。公共道德的层次性决定了社区和谐的向度,因此,实现社区和谐与公共道德的互动是构建社会主义和谐社会的上佳选择。     

政府与社会风险管理探析

随着全球范围进入高风险社会,我国社会的各种不和谐因素也日益具有高风险的性质,直接危及社会的运行安全。树立社会风险管理意识,建立和完善社会风险管理体系,不断加强对新形势下各类社会风险形成规律的研究,最大限度地保障社会秩序和公共利益,实现社会的正常运转和可持续发展,是构建社会主义和谐社会的必然要求。     

论鬼船欺诈及其法律防控机制

鬼船欺诈是海事欺诈的一种形式,欺诈者借鬼船窃取货物,给国际货物贸易的买卖双方、保险人都造成了极大的经济损失。鬼船欺诈之所以产生并蔓延有着多方面的原因。应通过多种途径对鬼船欺诈进行有效的预防和打击。     

通向一种文化诗学:新历史主义批评的研究综述

作为20世纪80年代后英美文论界的新兴批评理论,新历史主义是在当代语境下对历史文本重新进行文化阐释和政治解读的阅读诗学。中西方学界对新历史主义的研究也呈现出各自的文化特征。本文以格林布拉特文化诗学为研究个案,在回顾新历史批评发展历程的同时,总体把握中西方学界对新历史主义的研究现状,重新把握新历史主义文化诗学在中国文化语境下的理论内涵。     

Cooperation Coupled with Conflicts: Korea–Japan Relations in the Post-Cold War Era

This article addresses a profoundly curious question of why Korea and Japan conflict with each other despite deepening ties and growing transactions. In contrast to the existing explanations, this article makes three analytical innovations. First, for inducing cooperation between Korea and Japan, what matters is convergence/divergence of external threat perception, not the magnitude of threat. Second, history is not a constant but a variable. Historical contentions can be escalated or deescalated depending on political situations. Third, the role of the US in managing Korea–Japan relations is important but not determinant. The style of US engagement in East Asia serves as an intervening variable for conflict management. This article suggests that frictions are highest when historical contentions are escalated and external threat perception diverges. On the other hand, cooperation potential is highest when historical contentions are deescalated and threat perception converges.     

Economic voting in South Korea: The 1988 assembly elections

The 1988 Assembly elections in South Korea provide an opportunity to explore whether voting based on short-term economic fluctuations was a feature of the elections. The research design regresses party votes from a large sample of the 224 electoral districts against several well-known determinants of Korean voting behavior (regionalism, urban-rural residence, and social class), as well as district unemployment rates and levels and changes in income. With traditional explanations of voting behavior held constant, income variables had no apparent influence on the vote. However, the coefficients for unemployment rates are large, statistically significant, and in a direction entirely consistent with the theory of rational economic voting. There are grounds for including short-term economic variables in future modeling of Korean electoral behavior.