Radio-Québec: Une institution publique à la recherche d'une mission

Abstract. Radio-Québec is the Quebec educational television service, the Quebec equivalent of the Ontario Educational Communications Authority or of the Public Broadcasting System in the United States. However, Radio-Québec has also had to carry the burden of a ‘second mandate’: a symbolic one. Its foundation was part of Daniel Johnson's strategy to recapture jurisdiction over broadcasting from the federal government. Eventually-so many people thought-Radio-Québec would replace Radio-Canada within the frontiers of Quebec. However, the course of its development led it into a number of severe administrative problems. There was an institutional conflict with the Ministry of Education. There was public criticism of the quality of its productions, to the effect that it resembled a sort of ‘televised radio’ Finally, there was an increasing gap between its costs and its revenues, which led the organization to seek increased funds, ‘to improve the quality of its programming’ It is argued that many of these problems have arisen because of an initial emphasis on local production at the expense of broadcasting as such. Because of Radio-Québec's ‘patriotic’ mandate perhaps, the setting up of production facilities enjoyed the highest priority. Only in this way could ‘made-in-Quebec’ programs be produced. Broadcasting, on the other hand, did not begin until four years after the organization's foundation. Sommaire. Radio-Québec est un réseau d'Etat de télévision éducative, l'équiva-lent québécois de l'Office de la télécommunication éducative de l'Ontario, (Ontario Educational Communications Authority) ou de la Public Broadcasting System aux Etats-Unis. Mais Radio-Québec se voit aussi attribuer un deuxième mandat: de type « symbolique ». En effet, sa fondation faisait partie de la stratégic générale de Daniel Johnson, qui réclamait la juridiction entière du Québec dans le domaine des communications. A long terme-dans l'esprit de nombreuses personnes-Radio-Québec remplacerait Radio-Canada à l'intérieur des fron-tières québécoises. Mais, au cours de son évolution, Radio-Québec fit face à une série de défis assez graves. Il y eut un conflit institutionnel avec le ministère de l'Education, son client principal. Il y eut des critiques faites à l'égard de sa pragrammation, selon laquelle on faisait « de la radio télévisée ». Enfin, il y eut un problème financier; l'écart croissant entre ses coûts et ses revenus, qui l'amena à réclamer un surcroît d'argent « pour améliorer la qualité de la programmation ». L'hypothèse de ce travail est que bon nombre de ces problèmes résultaient d'une décision de développer d'abord le secteur de la production aux dépens du secteur diffusion. Peut-être à cause de son mandat « patriotique », la production eut la premiere priorité. C'était là le seul moyen de réaliser des documents « faits au Québec ». La diffusion, par contre, ne commença que quatre ans après sa fondation.     

Beyond the categories: human service managers view the new federal aid

Social agency chief executives in six program areas--welfare, health, mental health, community action, model cities, and community mental health centers--were surveyed to determine their reaction to the recent revenue sharing/block grant efforts to decentralize the federal aid system. Despite their strong belief that social initiatives and values were advanced principally by federal action, and that excessive reliance on state and local officials could severely jeopardize social programs with weak constituencies, agency executives also recognized major weaknesses in traditional categorical grant policy and, to varying degrees, supported revenue sharing and block grant alternatives. Those agencies largely dependent on federal support for their survival--model cities, community action programs, and community mental health centers--tended to support the new aid efforts only reluctantly. Those agencies more fully integrated into the regular policy-making arrangements of local government--health, welfare, and mental health agencies--were considerably more positive in their endorsement of greater decentralization.     

India’s South-South Cooperation in Human Resource Development

ABSTRACT

The article reviews several of the main modalities of India’s human resources’ involvement with other developing economies, and especially those in Africa. These involve the provision of long-term scholarships and short-term professional training awards. Comparison is made, in the case of international students, between the scholarship and privately funded categories, and also between those from Commonwealth and non-Commonwealth countries. Comparable data on such assisted foreign student flows are also offered in respect of South Africa. Other modalities of India’s HRD engagement with Africa are analysed, including those associated with the India-African Forum Summits (IAFS). India also does capacity building through non-state actors, notably nongovernment organisations and the private sector. Furthermore, it promotes cultural diplomacy through its Indian Cultural Centres and Chairs of Indian Studies, though these are not restricted to developing economies. Although attention is paid to the Commonwealth dimension in these comparisons, it is acknowledged that the classification of students and countries as Commonwealth may not be as widespread or meaningful today as 60 years ago.     

Getting engaged: Public‐service merit and motivation revisited

Abstract: The concepts of merit and motivation are central to recruiting and retaining high‐quality public servants. The meaning of merit has evolved to the more flexible interpretation contained in the 2003 federal Public Service Employment Act (PSEA), and the concept of motivation has become much more central to public management. The PSEA enshrines merit and non‐partisanship as the main values to be protected in public‐service appointments. It also provides a new definition of merit. Employees with a high level of public‐service motivation (PSM) are predisposed to having greater job satisfaction and organizational commitment and, therefore, to performing at a higher level. The challenge is to recruit and retain employees with a high PSM level and to maintain this level while fostering high performance by other employees. This challenge is being pursued in part by fostering employee engagement in the sense of job/organization satisfaction and organizational commitment. Among the major drivers of employee engagement is fair staffing practices, including merit‐based hiring. The successful pursuit of a high level of employee engagement can improve public‐sector management in general and human resource management in particular.