Do Employers Prefer Workers Who Attend For‐Profit Colleges? Evidence from a Field Experiment

This paper reports results from a resume‐based field experiment designed to examine employer preferences for job applicants who attended for‐profit colleges. For‐profit colleges have seen sharp increases in enrollment in recent years despite alternatives, such as public community colleges, being much cheaper. We sent almost 9,000 fictitious resumes of young job applicants who recently completed their schooling to online job postings in six occupational categories and tracked employer callback rates. We find no evidence that employers prefer applicants with resumes listing a for‐profit college relative to those whose resumes list either a community college or no college at all.     

On Coase and COVID-19

European Journal of Law and Economics - From an epidemiological perspective, the COVID-19 pandemic is a public health crisis. From an economic perspective, it is an externality and a social cost....     

New town,new capital,new workplace? The employment relations of a Japnese inward investors in West Midlands new town

In this paper we examine the chracter of employment and industrial relatins withing new manufacturing industry in a new-town setting. We show how a combination ofnational and local state initiatives generated a new patterno of manuafacturin, dominated by foreign-owned companies. Drawing from extensive fieldwork in Japanese firms, we demonstrate,contra the ‘japanization’ thesis, that greenfield sites do not proved employers with unconstained opportunities to control labour. Rather, we highlight how capoital-labour relations development through interaction between large firms, state agencies and workers, producing an evoling and contested new employment settlement. Our analysis also undelines the limits confronting local state development strategies under a neo-liberal state regime.     

‘This gun is our food’: Disarming the White Army militias of South Sudan

The continued presence of ‘other armed groups’ poses a significant challenge to furthering peace and stability in post-conflict environments. A good example of this was ‘White Army’ militias, which maintained an armed presence after the signing of Sudan's Comprehensive Peace Agreement in 2005. This article presents an empirical mapping of the White Army militias as well as a detailed analysis of the disarmament strategies that were implemented for them during the course of 2006. The article concludes with an analysis of the successes in achieving disarmament of White Army militias as well as the continuing challenges faced by Sudanese authorities and the international community alike in building sustainable conditions for peace.     

Public and private health‐care systems: what the literature says

Abstract: Since policy‐makers and health‐care administrators across Canada are currently interested in using privatization as a method of health‐system reform, an analysis of public‐private health systems and privatization initiatives is relevant, if not critical, at this time. The widespread and long‐standing popularity and considerable successes of the Canadian health‐care system demand such an analysis. The many investigations and other evaluative reports describing the performance of health systems and privatization make this analysis possible. The author conducted an extensive review of research and other literature on health‐sector privatization and private‐ or public‐health systems. Three themes depicting various public‐private relationships were found: 1) public or private delivery, payment, and administration of health care; 2) integration or separation of public‐ and private‐health sectors; and 3) the conceptualization of health care as a commodity or a right. These themes are examined through the prism of the Canadian health‐care system and recent developments in Alberta. A discussion of their operational successes, failures, limitations and other issues follows. The literature review shows that privatization, particularly if undertaken in what has been an essentially “public” health system such as Canada's, needs to be approached ‐ if at all ‐ with caution. Increased controls such as new forms of legislation and regulation would clearly be necessary. Research to monitor the effect of privatization initiatives would also be needed. Sommaire:EAtant donné que les décideurs et administrateurs de soins de santé Canadiens s'intéressent actuellement à la privatisation comme méthode de réforme du système de santé, une analyse des systèmes de santé public et privé et des initiatives de privatisation est par conséquent pertinente sinon essentielle. La vaste popularité de longue date et le succès considérable du système de soins de santé canadien exigent une telle analyse. Cette analyse a été rendue possible grâce aux nombreuses enquêtes et autres rapports d'évaluation décrivant le rendement des systèmes de santé et la privatisation. L'auteur a mené un examen approfondi des documents de recherche et autres écrits concernant la privatisation du secteur de la santé et les systèmes de santé public et privé. Trois thèmes dépeignant diverses relations entreles systèmes public et privé sont ressortis de cet examen: 1) la prestation, le paiement et l'administration des soins de santé, publics ou privés. 2) l'intégration ou la séparation des secteurs de santé public et privé; et 3) la conceptualisation des soins de santé, en tant que produit ou droit. Ces thèmes sont examinés à travers le système canadien de soins de santé et certains faits récents survenus et Alberta. Un débat s'ensuit sur les succès opérationnels, les échecs, les limitations de ces systèmes respectifs et sur d'autres questions. L'analyse documentaire montre que la privatisation ‐ en particulier si elle est entreprise dans un systeme de santé essentiellement public °Comme c'est le cas au Canada ‐ doit être abordée avec prudence ou pas du tout. Il serait absolument nécessaire d'instaurer des contrôles accrus par le biais de nouvelles lois et de nouveaux règlements. Il serait également nécessaire de contrôler les répercussions des initiatives de privatisation.     

Analysis: The contribution of intelligence services to security sector reform

The concept of security sector reform has introduced the idea that the security sector is a legitimate recipient of donor assistance, but cooperation with intelligence services remains problematic. They are principally seen as a subject for reform rather than a contributor to it. I argue that intelligence services can reduce institutional inertia in the security sector, contribute to the rejection of outdated risks and the identification of new ones, and underpin the process of reform. To do so they require careful management and effective oversight. I propose a new definition of intelligence and a new distinction between intelligence and security that aim to capture the potential contribution of intelligence services to security sector reform.