城乡关系视野中的中国民俗传统与发展

民俗作为约定俗成的社会认同,其意义在于缔结了一种社会关系。"地方"认同作为中国民俗实现从文化"生态"向"价值"升华的契机,在于其内含的"整体"性体认;"整体"性体认所产生的"能栖居"的地方认同,正是使"约定俗成"的民俗活动从偶然性关系升华成为必然性的价值保障。以此角度来观照中国民俗传统的发展,便可从中国民俗学研究传统中的"村落中心论"获得反思的角度,发现城乡关系于民俗传统传承的重要意义。     

The Diffusion of the Concept of Public Figure in China

This article considers how and why the legal concept of public figure, which holds public figures to a higher standard that makes it more difficult for them to recover damages when suing for libel, has been diffused in China. The public figure concept developed in the U.S. context as an extension of New York Times v. Sullivan from public officials to public figures, reflecting the deeply embedded value of freedom of expression. Despite authoritarianism in China, the concept was adapted in the rulings of some local courts to define the limits of the right to reputation. The diffusion was a response to a stream of litigation against media organizations. In the process of diffusion and adaptation, courts have acted strategically to reshape the public figure concept and refashion its justifications. Given the political constraints on courts in authoritarian China, they have been careful to avoid applying the concept to public officials, and instead have applied the concept to public figures such as celebrities. The diffusion of the concept in China sheds light on theories of legal diffusion more broadly, by illustrating how the process of diffusion can be bottom‐up and open‐ended, and how it can occur even in a counter‐intuitive case in which there are significant political and ideational differences between the two countries.     

Effects of the NICHD Protocol Training on Child Investigative Interview Quality in Korean Police Officers

This study was conducted to determine, by comparing pre- and post-training interview of 18 Korean police officers, whether training in use of the NICHD Protocol improved the quality of investigative interviews of allegedly abused child victims. Results showed that Korean police officers more often followed the Protocol structure -they introduced themselves, explained the ground rules, and conducted episodic memory training-after they had been trained. Moreover, police officers used approximately three times as many desirable prompts (such as invitations and facilitators) and fewer suggestive prompts in interviews conducted after as opposed to before the training. Invitations elicited approximately four to seven times more details on average than the least productive prompts. These results confirmed that the NICHD Protocol is effective when used to interview alleged child abuse victims in East Asia.     

大学生不满意度与群体行为倾向调查——以浙江某高校为例

大学生在主观上较为认同群体行为的正当性,但在行为倾向方面依然较为理性和保守.大学生对周围环境(社会环境和校园环境)的满意度为一般,对周围环境的不满意度与群体行为倾向之间具有显著的相关性.政府和学校要改善环境,建立大学生表达政治观点和情绪的渠道与机制,建立健全信息发布机制,避免事态扩大甚至恶化.     

由青少年严重刑事犯罪的现场透视其犯罪心理

青少年严重刑事犯罪已经引起有关专家学者的高度重视,但是其现场特征及由此折射出的青少年犯罪心理却常被人们所忽视。因此,有必要透过青少年严重刑事犯罪的现场,分析其犯罪心理的产生、特点,并在此基础上提出矫正建议。     

大学生就业能力的多角度剖析及对策探讨——对重庆市1618名在校大学生的调查与分析

大学生就业问题是当前全社会关注的焦点和热点,解决这一问题的关键在于提升大学生的就业能力.文章分析了大学生就业能力所存在的问题,从大学生自身、高校、政府三个角度解析其原因,并提出时策建议.     

论公证邮寄送达催收通知能否发生诉讼时效中断

实践中,债权人通过邮寄的方式,向债务人或者担保人进行邮寄送达催收,并依法给予公证的做法是比较常见的。但是,由于我国现行法律没有对该公证邮寄送达催收通知的法律效力作出较为明确的规定,因此,笔者依据我国现行的法律及其司法解释、结合我国司法实践中两种比较常见的学术观点,适用民事诉讼证据中高度盖然性的证明标准,对公证邮寄送达催收通知能否发生诉讼时效中断的效力问题进行相应论述。     

中美公共政策评估系统比较及启示

构思精美,设计精良的政策并非都能达到预期的效果.由于认知的局限性和政策的复杂性,在政策实践中,事与愿违的现象是普遍存在的.因此,政策评估至关重要.现代意义上的政策评估兴起于上世纪60一70年代的美国,而我国在引进政策科学后总体上仍处于"引进"阶段,尚未完全完成"消化、吸收尤其是创新"过程.本文通过比较研究中美两国在公共政策评估系统的差异,从评估者、评估对象、评估目的、评估标准和评估方法五个方面对比分析,得出一些针对我国公共政策评估系统存在问题的启示.     

《丹麦刑事执行法》的主要内容及其对我国立法的启示

《丹麦刑事执行法》内容全面而系统,操作性强,蕴涵人权保护、行刑社会化等法制理念,自2000年颁布施行以来,对该国刑事执行工作的良性运作发挥了重大作用。虽然我国与丹麦在政治制度、历史文化传统等方面存在差异,但他山之石,可以攻玉,对《丹麦刑事执行法》的统一立法体例、先进的执行理念以及对罪犯权利的保障等制度规则的研究与探索,对我国刑事执行立法具有重要意义。     

对完善我国环境影响评价法律制度的思考——厦门PX项目和上海磁悬浮项目环评风波的启示

环境影响评价是为预防和减轻拟从事的开发行为对环境可能造成的不良影响而实施的一项环境法律制度.我国的现行环评制度在适用范围、启动时间、环评机构的中立性、环评内容、公众参与、法律责任等方面都存在很大的不足,制约了其预防作用的发挥.为完善我国的环评制度,应借鉴国外经验,扩大环评范围,充实环评内容.保障公众参与,严格法律责任,实现"阳光环评"、"民主环评"及"科学环评".