Space,scale and jurisdiction in health service provision for drug users: the legal geography of a supervised injecting facility

Sydney's Medically Supervised Injecting Centre delivers the significant benefits of harm reduction, but has been controversial regards the law. Its contested history is examined here through the lens of legal geography. Narrative analysis reveals that the arguments for and against the centre's establishment referenced matters ranging from international treaties through to municipal governance. These arguments and their outcome were variously shaped by the different spaces and scales of jurisdiction but not simply in a zero sum game of law played out through the hierarchically ordered nesting of container-like territories. The implications for legal geography and for public health are discussed.     

PRICE SQUEEZE: LESSONS FROM THE TELECOM ITALIA CASE

This paper analyzes a price squeeze case in the provision oftelecommunication services to the Italian Public Administration,in which Telecom Italia, the incumbent company, was condemnedfor bidding below costs. We develop the analysis of the casehighlighting the possible anticompetitive story and the alternativecompetitive explanation. We then construct a quantitative imputationtest to verify the alleged anticompetitive behavior. The methodologicalissues and the assumptions needed to implement the test arediscussed in detail, showing their link to a precise test ofthe anticompetitive story. We discuss the reasons why the AntitrustAuthority and our views diverge over the evaluation of TelecomItalia bidding. The role of judicial review in cases with complexeconomic arguments is discussed.