论"新布什主义"

布什第二任期伊始推出以“铲除暴政”和“推进自由”为主旨的“新布什主义”,是其第一任期“先发制人”“、单边主义”政策基础上的一种策略调整,表面上有一定的灵活性,骨子里却更加强硬。第二任期内在对华关系上将坚持两手政策,力求稳定台海局势。     

元好问在金代灭亡以后的活动历程

元好问是金代杰出的诗词曲大家。本分析金亡以后,元好问在蒙古王朝统治下,诗词曲创作和理论探讨方面取得的伟大成就;在编撰金代史料方面取得的重大成果;还肯定元好问在宣传儒学,保护儒士名贤,促进中华各民族之间的友谊团结等方面的重要贡献。     

反腐倡廉教育：大学生思想政治工作的新课题

加强大学生反腐倡廉教育,不仅是高校大学生思想政治教育的重要内容,也是培养合格人才和后备干部的迫切需要,同时还是构建高校惩治和预防腐败体系的有机组成部分。因此,高校要积极发挥育人功能和优势,使反腐倡廉教育突出目的性、层次性、系统性和实效性。     

Legal reform or erasure of history? The politics of moral crimes in Afghanistan

ABSTRACT

In this article we reflect on our efforts to study the prosecution of moral crimes in Afghanistan. In the process of collating information about men and women imprisoned for moral crimes such as adultery, we found evidence that pointed to large-scale incarceration of men for the uncodified crime of elopement. After establishing this fact through a careful review of official data, the article considers two interrelated themes. First, we argue that government attempts to conceal its extralegal practices cannot be reduced to the question of a corrupt bureaucracy or weak governance. Rather, they reflect a fundamental tension between a modern state’s interest in projecting the rule of (codified) law and societal expectations arising from both Islamic and customary law. Second, we suggest that officials seek to address this conceptual tension between the different bodies of law through a complex process involving both accommodation and concealment. In day-to-day judicial practice, ‘assimilation’ refers to attempts to rely on sharia provisions to accommodate customary practices which have no counterpart in statutory law. ‘Dissimulation’ refers to bureaucratic actions aimed at concealing the actual practices which make such extralegal accommodations possible.     

雄心勃勃，困难重重——美国新总统奥巴马执政100天的内外政策评析

奥巴马执政100天来，面对“一场危机”和“两场战争”空前严峻的挑战，在内政和外交领域锐意创新、稳妥应对，开局总体顺利并取得了一定的成效。以现实主义与和解精神为鲜明特征的“奥巴马主义”也初露端倪，受到国际社会的欢迎。未来，奥巴马执政之路仍将任重而道远。奥巴马能否在执政初期进一步夯实执政基础，带领美国尽快走出经济危机，摆脱内外交困的局面，将是对奥巴马本人及其团队的重大考验。     

Perceptions of Economic Inequality and Support for Redistribution: The role of Existential and Utopian Standards

Perceived greater economic inequality is supposedly associated with higher demand for redistribution. However, the findings in the literature are mixed in this regard, with some researchers providing evidence in favour of this association and some findings evidence against it. Given that perceived economic inequality and endorsement of system-justifying beliefs are related to increased inequality acceptance, we explore the interplay between them in relation to support for redistribution. This study is intended to shed light on the role of utopian standards (ideal estimates about what ought to be) as one mechanism that affects the relationship between perceived greater economic inequality and support for redistribution. Based on correlational data (N?=?794), we conducted a conditional process analysis and found that perceived greater inequality displayed a negative indirect effect on support for redistribution, through acceptance of ideal level of economic inequality: Perception of higher inequality was related to increased ideal levels of inequality and thus with lower support for redistribution. In addition, we found that economic system-justifying beliefs conditioned the effect of perceived economic inequality in two ways: First, perceived economic inequality was positively associated with higher acceptance of inequality, and this association was stronger for those that justified the economic system more, and perceived greater inequality was associated with higher support for redistribution—but only for those who endorsed lower levels of economic system justification beliefs. These findings provide evidence that perceived greater economic inequality does not in itself lead to a push for more redistribution; rather, utopian standards such as ideal estimates of economic inequality, which are conditioned by system-justifying ideologies.