排序方式: 共有9条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Law and Philosophy - 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
Alan Wertheimer 《Journal of Law and the Biosciences》2015,2(1):2-32
There is an important distinction between ethical standards for the conduct of research with human subjects and the ethics of promulgating principles of research ethics. Those who promulgate ethical standards for the conduct of research have an ethical responsibility to consider the consequences to which those promulgations give rise. In particular, they must consider whether their promulgations will give researchers incentives not to conduct research or not to conduct research in locales in which participants would benefit from participation. I first show how such ‘diversion effects’ are possible and then examine four principles of research ethics in that light. I then consider several objections to the argument that those who promulgate principles of research ethics should consider diversion effects. 相似文献
5.
Alan Wertheimer 《Journal of Law and the Biosciences》2014,1(2):137-182
It is widely accepted that informed consent is a requirement of ethical biomedical research. It is less clear why this is so. As an argumentative strategy the article asks whether it would be legitimate for the state to require people to participate in research. This article argues that the consent requirement cannot be defended by appeal to any simple principle, such as not treating people merely as a means, bodily integrity, and autonomy. As an argumentative strategy the article asks whether it would be legitimate for the state to require people to participate in research. I argue that while it would be legitimate and potentially justifiable to coerce people to participate in research as a matter of first-order moral principles, there are good reasons to adopt a general prohibition on coercive participation as a matter of second-order morality. 相似文献
6.
7.
Wertheimer A 《Denver University law review》1997,74(4):1215-1229
8.
Law and Philosophy - 相似文献
9.
1