Transparency in multilateral climate politics: Furthering (or distracting from) accountability?

This article analyzes the interplay between transparency and accountability in multilateral climate politics. The 2015 Paris Agreement calls for a “pledge‐and‐review” approach to collective climate action with an “enhanced transparency framework” as a key pillar of the Agreement. By making visible who is doing what, transparency is widely assumed to be vital to holding countries to account and building trust. We explore whether transparency is generating such effects in this context, by developing and applying an analytical framework to examine the link between transparency and accountability. We find that the scope and practices of climate transparency reflect (rather than necessarily reduce) broader conflicts over who should be held to account to whom and about what, with regard to responsibility and burden sharing for ambitious climate action. We conclude that the relationship between transparency and accountability is less straightforward than assumed, and that the transformative promise of transparency needs to be reconsidered in this light.     

Disconnected relationship values and marriage policies in England

The article examines relationship values which influence the government’s marriage-related policies. It constructs a framework of core values as the ‘conception of the desirable’ to highlight a central problem for the government: there are many conflicting values that can be identified as potentially relevant. Traditional morality and equality highlight marriage as the ultimate goal for heterosexual and same-sex couples by emphasising responsibility, commitment and stability to encourage and strengthen couple relationships. The articulation of these values associated with celebrating marriage is evident in policies such as transferable tax allowances for married couples and couple relationship education. However, marriage is a public and a private institution which encompasses disconnected values. The article analyses the different values that policy-makers confront by examining evidence from interviews with stakeholders which suggests that marriage-related policies do not necessarily resonate with various actors’ understanding of relationship values. They compete with values such as individual autonomy, the desire for financial security and diverse relationships.     

Offender’s Personal Circumstances and Punishment: Toward a More Refined Model for the Explanation of Sentencing Disparities

Prior research suggests that offender sex, age, and race are often influential determinants of sentencing outcomes. According to focal concerns theory, they affect sentencing because—due to limited time and information—judges rely on stereotypical behavioral expectations when assessing offender blameworthiness and dangerousness. As such, extralegal offender characteristics may serve as proxies for more specific risk indicators. Whether more complete information on additional risk factors helps account for the effects of extralegal characteristics, however, remains an untested assumption. Therefore, this study analyzes the Dutch data on standardized pre-sentencing reports to examine the influence of personal circumstances of the offender, such as employment, family, and drug use factors, on the likelihood and length of incarceration. The results suggest that personal circumstances exert inconsistent influence over sentencing outcomes and that they fail to significantly mitigate the direct effects of sex and age, but do mitigate the effects of national origin.     

A Comparative Analysis of the Drafting of European Private Law

The development of the 'Common Frame of Reference' is a highly prominent topic on the agenda of European integration. However, its underlying procedures have had only limited investigation. This article discusses the European private law project by inquiring into the drafting experiences of four other private law legislative processes, with a focus on sales law. These instruments concern Article 2 (on sales) of the American Uniform Commercial Code, the Vienna Sales Convention, the Dutch Civil Code and the Directive on Consumer Sales and Associated Guarantees. Ultimately, the article asks what can the European project learn from these experiences.     

Evaluation of the use of freezer mill to improve DNA retrieval from dried cotton swabs

This investigation evaluated the use of a freezer mill to improve retrieval of DNA from dried cotton swabs (using 100 μl saliva) compared to uncrushed swabs and whole saliva by measuring DNA yield and profile average peak height. Three treatments were tested; short, medium (as for a bone sample) and extended. The samples subjected to the freezer mill had the powder that remained on the freezer mill components collected (using a water and agitation method). All freezer mill samples returned a lower average DNA yield than either uncrushed swabs or whole saliva. The powder from the crushed swabs comprised an average of 35% of the total DNA yield, whereas the powder from the components comprised 65%. Allele drop-out was observed in samples exposed to extended treatments. Both short and medium treatments provided significantly higher peak heights than uncrushed cotton swabs with equal quantities of DNA (P < 0.05). Using a freezer mill on dried cotton swabs does not increase the DNA yield. This investigation suggests collecting powder from the freezer mill components will increase DNA yield, especially from trace samples.     

COMPETITION IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MARKETS: ARE LATIN NOTARIES DIFFERENT?

Competition in markets for services offered by Latin notariesmay not work properly because of information asymmetries andthe need to guarantee an optimal supply of public goods. InEurope, there have been two test cases allowing for an assessmentof the effects of liberalization: the abolishment of the solicitors’monopoly for conveyancing services in England and Wales andthe deregulation of the Dutch notary profession. Both casesshow that deregulation does not guarantee lower prices. Moreover,the Dutch experience shows that there is a justified concernthat competition may decrease quality and jeopardize the notary'sintegrity. For these reasons, regulation may be justified aslong as effective instruments to control and monitor qualityare not (yet) in place. Since legal certainty has characteristicsof a public good, competition also tends to increase the numberof disputes on the legal validity of documents certifying legaltransactions. A comparison of the tasks of a Latin notary andthose of an American notary public provides reasons to fearthat, after deregulation, protection against legally invalidtransactions may be available only at higher prices. Finally,the Dutch experience shows that fee regulations remain necessaryto guarantee the accessibility of notarial services.