Verfassungsrechtliche Bedenken gegen die RHG Novelle 2009

Im Jahre 2009 wurde durch eine ?nderung des B-VG und des RHG die Kompetenz des RH zur Prüfung privatwirtschaftlicher Unternehmen auf Betriebe, welche durch den Bund „tats?chlich beherrscht“ werden, ausgeweitet. Der folgende Beitrag m?chte zeigen, dass es nicht m?glich ist, diesen neuen Tatbestand ausreichend abzugrenzen. Somit handelt es sich um einen unbestimmten Gesetzesbegriff, welcher Tatbestandsmerkmal einer Kompetenznorm ist. Dies stellt nach der hier vertretenen Ansicht einen Versto? des § 12 (1) RHG gegen Art 18 Abs 1 B-VG dar.     

与医源性相关的输卵管妊娠破裂死亡法医病理学研究

目的探讨输卵管妊娠破裂死亡的特点.方法对1990-2005年10月间华西医科大学法医学院14例输卵管妊娠破裂死亡尸检病例进行分析.结果死亡病例以31～34岁之间居多,职业以农民、个体户、待业多见.孕次和流产的关系分析表明,其妊娠破裂以生育过、怀孕2～4次、流产2～4次居多.危险因素以宫内安置节育环、不育症为主.输卵管妊娠死亡多发生在区级医院及个体卫生所,以菌痢治疗多见.尸解所见均为腹腔积血,病理观察见绒毛组织结构,且符合失血性休克的病理改变.结论孕龄期妇女应注意月经期,出现闭经及腹部不适症状应急时到医院做检查,医院同时应做HCG检查及B超检查以便做出正确诊断及治疗.     

An unusual case of suicidal carbon monoxide poisoning

A 35 years old student with prior suicidal tendencies was found dead laying enclosed in a plastic-bag together with four plastic-bags of minor capacity. Three bags were opened by cuts and empty, one bag contained 73 1 of 83.2 Vol.% carbon monoxide. Postmortem carboxyhemoglobin concentrations in blood of five different regions of the corpse ranged from 80.3% to 93.4%. From the circumstances--chemicals and apparatus--it could be reconstructed that carbon monoxide was produced by the reactions of formic acid and sulfuric acid.     

Determination of ABO blood group markers in single hair segments

Determination of ABO-blood group on human hair segments of 79 individuals was performed by means of modified Yada absorption-elutions technique. The studies were carried out with 4 micron thin cross sections of hair. In 79% of the cases it was possible to establish the correct blood group. Individual hair segments of 0.5 cm length yielded reliable results. Antigen identification was best with blood group B and most difficult of the AB type.     

House money effects on trust and reciprocity

In a typical laboratory “Investment Game” experiment, participants’ endowments are provided by the experimenter; thus, the worst case for the investor is that she loses all of her “found” money. By contrast, in naturally occurring environments, investment decisions can often lead to a loss of one’s own money. This paper investigates whether “trust” found in one-shot anonymous laboratory interaction is robust to “own money” environments. Our results show that, consistent with previous investment game results, most investors send a positive amount, and most trustees return at least the transfer amount, regardless of whether the investors purchase or are gifted their endowment. However, investments are on average lower when participants use their own money, and the fraction of maximum investments (the most “risky” investment decision) is only half as large under “own money” as it is under gifted endowments. Our results explain why one should exercise caution in placing trust in any government’s ability to spend other people’s money prudently.