Democratization as liberation: competing African perspectives on democracy

Do Africans tend to view democracy in more procedural or more substantive terms? This article argues that African endorsements of liberal and procedural understandings are not as pervasive as much of the literature on democratization suggests. Drawing upon Afrobarometer survey results as well as extensive fieldwork and interviews conducted over the past decade in South Africa, it demonstrates both the historical development and significance of these definitional understandings. By employing a substantive approach and thereby bringing questions of poverty and material inequality to the centre of the analysis, this article seeks to offer a perspective on democratization that helps to explain many of the challenges to the institutionalization of democratic regimes that procedural understandings fail to capture.     

Informale Gestattungen und §§ 327, 325 StGB

Informalit?t ist eine allt?gliche Erscheinungsform des Verwaltungshandelns. Informales Verwaltungshandeln in Form von informalen Gestattungen wird in der rechtlichen Diskussion jedoch nur undifferenziert unter dem Stichwort der Duldung daraufhin untersucht, ob diese trotz des Fehlens einer expliziten formalen Gestattung zur Straflosigkeit führen kann. Der konturenlose Sammelbegriff der Duldung kann aber die verschiedenen Erscheinungsformen informaler Gestattungen nicht erfassen. Die vorliegende Abhandlung will dem Ph?nomen informalen Verwaltungshandelns in Form der informalen Gestattungen eine eigene Struktur verleihen und untersucht im Anschluss daran deren Auswirkungen auf das Umweltstrafrecht. Bei der vorliegenden Abhandlung handelt es sich folglich um eine „Zwei-S?ulen-Betrachtung“ an der Schnittstelle zwischen (besonderem) Verwaltungsrecht und (Umwelt-)Strafrecht, so dass es sich um einen interdisziplin?ren Beitrag handelt.     

Umsetzung der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie bei FFH- und Vogelschutzgebieten

Keine Zusammenfassung     

Security governance and the private military industry in Europe and North America

Even before Iraq, the grow ing use of private military contractors has been widely discussed in the academic and public literature. However, the reasons for the proliferation of private military companies and its implications are frequently generalized due to a lack of suitable theoretical approaches for the analysis of private means of violence in contemporary security. Consequently, this article contends, the analysis of the growth of the private military industry typically conflates two separate developments: the failure of some developing states to provide for their national security and the privatization of military services in industrialized nations in Europe and North America. This article focuses on the latter and argues that the concept of security governance can be used as a theoretical framework for understanding the distinct development, problems and solutions for the governance of the private military industry in developed countries.