Organising development: Comparing the national systems of entrepreneurship in Sweden and South Korea

The dominant paradigms of economic development have created an artificial institutional division between spontaneous markets and instrumental states. Opposing policy agendas have evolved and remain entrenched. This article seeks to challenge both approaches by reconsidering the role of entrepreneurship in economic development. Adopting an evolutionary perspective, it argues that a national system of entrepreneurship provides an appropriate framework for combining the creative and destructive processes inherent in entrepreneurship with the institutional diversity characteristic of successful economic development. The article illustrates this argument by comparing the development experiences of Sweden and South Korea.     

International Exchanges of Beijing Capital Agribusiness Group

<正>Beijing Capital Agribusiness Group(hereinafter referred to as CAG),previously known as Beijing Municipal State Farm Administration,is an industry leader of strong brand competitiveness with 133 thousand hectares of state-owned land,40000 employees and a total asset of 50 billion     

Right Time for China-Latin American Cooperation:Notes on CAFIU Delegation’s Visit to Cuba and Argentina

<正>Since the visit of President Xi Jinping to four Latin American countries in July 2014,Cuba and Argentina have come into Chinese people’s sight more frequently.With comprehensive and friendly relations between China and Cuba further developed and deepened,and China-Argentina ties were upgraded to a comprehensive strategic     

检察机关提起公益诉讼问题探讨

检察机关提起公益诉讼应遵循尊重私权原则、谦抑原则、法定原则、程序保障原则,公益诉讼的案件范围应是有限的,且以列举方式予以确定。检察机关提起公益诉讼应当以有关机关或组织的不起诉为前提,且免交诉讼费用。检察机关提出的诉讼请求一般不应包括损害赔偿。公益诉讼案件能否调解应具体分析,不能一概论之。     

法律事实的意义辨析

民法学通常将法律事实作为引致法律关系得丧变更的具体事实。但该定位隐含着表达与所指的错位,并缺失立法视角的审视,其法律意义还容易被常识所覆盖。要修正这些不当,宜从立法视角出发,以规范为定位点,法律事实因此可一般化为与法律效果对应的构成要件,即在特定功能引导下经由专业逻辑安排而形成的格式化社会现实的规范工具,同时又能具体化为构成要件中的构造要素。它们的关系错综而有序,反映了民法的体系性。以规范面目出现的法律事实是法律理念与现实的对应与调适,在适用中还要与个案的具体事实再次对应与调适。法律事实由此充满互动的张力,同时也使民法学有了多元的知识资源。但无论如何,法律事实并非具体事实。