"大学文化与育人为本"学术研讨会综述

2010年6月25至26日,由大学文化研究与发展中心主办、浙江师范大学田家炳教育科学研究院承办的"大学文化与育人为本"学术研讨会在浙江师范大学召开,大学文化研究与发展中心顾问王翼生、浙江师范大学田家炳教育科学研究院院长眭依凡教授主持会议,来自北京大学、清华大学、浙江大学等高校的50余位学者、大学管理者就求解"钱学森之问"、培养杰出人才以及大学去行政化等话题展开讨论.     

The past in the present: Historical memory and German national security policy

In recent years a number of scholars and commentators have suggested that freed of the constraints placed upon it by the Cold War, Germany is likely to aspire to a more active, great power role. This article argues that such predictions overlook the extent to which German national security policy continues to be burdened by the lessons that its population drew from the Second World War and that make it profoundly difficult for any German leader to implement a more active defence and national security policy.     

税收征管的立法完善及其现实意义

税收征管是保障国家税收工作顺利进行的重要手段 ,新修订的《中华人民共和国税收征收管理法》对税收征管过程中出现的新问题做出了更加细致的规定 ,弥补了过去税收征管工作中立法不完善、操作性差的缺点 ,通过加强税务机关服务职能、推广计算机的使用 ,与国防惯例相接轨 ,为我国加入WTO消除了税收征管领域的障碍。     

20世纪90年代以前拉美国家金融压抑的状况及其影响

拉美国家是比较早实施金融自由化改革的发展中国家.导致拉美国家实施金融自由化改革的原因有很多,但是最根本、最深厚的原因在于该地区长期对经济实施干预政策,金融压抑现象严重,阻碍了经济的发展.拉美国家20世纪90年代以前实施金融压抑政策的原因主要是受凯恩斯国家干预主义的影响、盛行经济民族主义以及实施进口替代工业化战略,主要表现为利率限制、高存款准备金率、直接信贷管制等.实施金融压抑政策初期对拉美经济发展起了促进作用,但随着时间的推移,其弊端逐渐显露,导致经济增长乏力、宏观经济动荡.     

发展现代农业的三大着力点

发展现代农业是一项系统工程.结合我国农业发展的现状和当前的国际经贸环境,我们不仅要用统筹城乡发展的理念跳出农业和农村的圈子发展农业,以发展现代工业的理念指导农业发展的各个环节,还必须借鉴发达国家的成功经验,用现代的方式支持、保障农业发展.同时,采取适度的贸易保护,形成农业可持续发展的外部环境也是十分必要的.     

The Future of War and American Military Strategy

The outcome of ongoing debates over the future of American military strategy will play a critical role in shaping the foreign and military policies of the United States over the next decade. Traditionalists worry about the shift towards emphasizing counterinsurgency (COIN) operations and irregular warfare, believing that the use of force is often ineffective in COIN situations and the American military should concentrate on planning for conventional war. In contrast, COIN advocates argue that the United States must focus its efforts on preparing for the wars it is most likely to fight, irregular wars. However, both schools of thought rely on assumptions about the future security environment that may reveal another path forward. First, although it seems intuitive to view irregular warfare as the dominant future concern, it is exceedingly difficult to predict accurately the future security environment, as the last 20 years have clearly shown. Second, and perhaps most importantly, the character of emergent threats will depend on how the United States focuses its resources. Paradoxically, no matter what it emphasizes, the military threats the United States is or will be most capable of defeating are the ones it is least likely to face, since potential adversaries will be deterred and seek other ways of confrontation. However, with some smart and careful investments, including the recognition that not all parts of the military have to be optimized for the same task, the United States military can both lock in its conventional dominance and continue to improve its ability to succeed in the irregular wars most likely to dominate the landscape in the short to medium term.