制度创新是加快农村经济发展的根本保障

加快农村经济发展是解决“三农”问题的核心,也是建设社会主义新农村的中心工作。当前,制度性、体制性制约已经成为影响农村经济发展的主要症结。因此,从现行的经济和社会管理体制、农村投融资体制、农村行政管理体制等方面切入,实现制度和机制创新已成为加快农村经济发展的根本措施。     

高校毕业生就业市场拓展的探索与实践

高校毕业生就业工作是社会关注的热点,是高校人才培养和办学水平的综合体现。其工作质量和效果是检验和反馈学校教育教学质量的重要指标。随着我国高等教育改革的不断深化,高校毕业生的就业形势发生了极大的变化。近年来高校毕业生就业形势日趋严峻,毕业生就业工作中亦暴露出不少问题。对此,我们必须认真分析目前高校毕业生就业市场的现状以及用人单位的选人标准,以期为高校毕业生就业市场的开拓提供切实有效的措施。     

比例原则在我国行政法上的引入和应用

行政比例原则和行政合理性原则都是对行政自由裁量行为的控制,但二者仍有不同之处,比例原则包括三个子原则:适当性原则、必要性原则和狭义比例原则,其更具有操作性,比例原则引入我国,可应用于我国行政立法、行政执法和行政司法之中。     

Inexplicable wealth and illicit enrichment of public officials: A model draft that respects human rights in corruption cases

The employment of crimes of inexplicable wealth as an anti-corruption tool has been increasingly advocated in recent years. The United Nations Convention against Corruption calls for the creation of a crime of illicit enrichment. This paper seeks to evaluate the drafting of such crimes from human rights and criminal justice perspectives. The author considers the jurisprudence from the United States, Canada, United Kingdom and South Africa, as well as the European Court of Human Rights. The paper also evaluates the Hong Kong inexplicable wealth offence and subjects it to criticism in terms of the rights of defendants and the lack of clarity in drafting. The author concludes that there is no need for a specific crime of inexplicable wealth. A crime of corruption is perfectly adequate. All that is required is the use of a special rule of evidence which places the evidential burden upon the defendant. The use of a mandatory presumption of law is the most clear analytical method of drafting. This is consistent with human rights standards and common law jurisprudence. Finally, regulatory offences requiring proper financial record keeping and declarations of wealth should be created alongside the more serious corruption offence. These could impose strict liability. Wealth previously declared by public officials should not be presumed to be corrupt funds for the purposes of any corruption prosecution. This approach is consistent with the United Nations Convention Against Corruption and would represent an acceptable mode of implementing that treaty.     

“能源与国际关系”中法暑期研讨班综述

2009年7月29～31日，由外交学院和法国战略学会共同主办的“‘能源与国际关系’2009年中法暑期研讨班”在辽宁省丹东市举行。研讨班邀请中、法专家与会，围绕研讨班主题，通过讲座、讨论等形式多样的教学活动介绍最新学术动态，开展学术交流。来自中国外交学院、法国战略学会、阿海珐（AREVA）中国公司、     

论反倾销领域中“非市场经济”问题

"非市场经济"这一法律概念在GATT/WTO法律框架下由各国反倾销法逐渐演变而成.自20世纪90年代以来,"市场经济"与"非市场经济"的区分已缺乏经济基础,很多国家却凭以采用特别方法对后者产品进行反倾销调查.这些方法深受政治、社会和经济等因素影响,构成相关出口商的歧视性待遇.必须通过政治、经济和法律手段才能最终解决"非市场经济"所引发的问题.     

Modeling Facts,Culture, and Cognition in the Gun Debate

Can empirical data generate consensus about how to regulate firearms? If so, under what conditions? Previously, we presented evidence that individuals' cultural worldviews explain their positions on gun control more powerfully than any other fact about them, including their race or gender, the type of community or region of the country they live in, and even their political ideology or party affiliation. On this basis, we inferred that culture is prior to facts in the gun debate: empirical data can be expected to persaude individuals to change their view on gun policies only after those individuals come to see those policies as compatible with their core cultural commitments. We now respond to critics. Canvassing the psychological literature, we identify the mechanisms that systematically induce individuals to conform their factual beliefs about guns to their culturally grounded moral evaluations of them. To illustrate the strength and practical implications of these dynamics, we develop a series of computer simulations, which show why public beliefs about the efficacy of gun control can be expected to remain highly polarized even in the face of compelling empirical evidence. Finally, we show that the contribution culture makes to cognition could potentially be harnessed to generate broad, cross-cultural consensus: if gun policies can be framed in terms that are expressively compatible with diverse cultural worldviews, the motivation to resist compelling empirical evidence will dissipate, and individuals of diverse cultural persuasions can be expected rapidly to converge in their beliefs about what policies are best. Constructing a new, expressively pluralistic idiom of gun control should therefore be the first priority of policy-makers and -analysts interested in promoting the adoption of sound gun policies.