Prosecutor Risk,Maturation, and Wrongful Conviction Practice

In this article we rethink the connection between prosecutorial experience and conviction psychology that undergirds much of the academic literature about wrongful convictions. The conviction psychology account of prosecutorial behavior asserts that prosecutorial susceptibility to cognitive biases deepens over time, thereby increasing the risk that prosecutors will become involved in wrongful convictions the longer they stay in the profession. Our interviews with more than 200 state prosecutors call into question the basis for this asserted correlation between prosecutorial experience and risk of misconduct. The prosecutors we met consistently reported that, all else equal, prosecutors tend to become more balanced, rather than more adversarial, over time. Hence, the prosecutors who present the greatest risk of producing a wrongful conviction are those who are either inexperienced or resistant to the normal maturation process. For this reason, we suggest that wrongful conviction researchers and database designers pay closer attention to the variables associated with prosecutorial experience and resistance that might affect the development of prosecutorial maturity and the consequent risk of wrongful convictions.     

高考改革背景下新建本科院校综合改革路径分析

党的十八届三中全会提出了深化中国教育的改革,高考改革和高校改革意味着中国教育的改革已经进入了攻坚阶段。尤其是高考改革,直接促使新建本科院校提速综合改革的进程。为此,应该在以下四个方面加快进程:办学定位由教学型到现代的教学—服务型;人才定性由技能型到现代的技能—素质型;专业定向由应用型到现代的应用—基础型,课程定制由实践型到现代的实践—通识型。     

证据认证模式刍议

证据的认证亦即对证据的证据能力和证明力进行审查判断,是人民法院查明案件事实、正确适用法律的前提。目前,立法上对证据的认证规则缺乏明确的规定,司法实践中对证据的认证模式也比较混乱。规范证据的认证模式,明确二步认证的证据认证模式无疑有利于提高案件的审判质量。     

私人利益和公共利益的含义及其辩证关系

正确理解和把握私人利益和公共利益的含义及其辩证关系,本着公平兼顾的原则,积极平衡协调私人利益和公共利益关系,依法保护私人利益和公共利益,是有效缓和、化解当前现实社会中因各种利益冲突而导致的社会矛盾和风险,实现整个社会有序和谐、充满发展活力的重要途径.     

合法行为的作为义务研究

合法行为可以引起作为义务，但要进行分类讨论，有责行为可以引起作为义务，无责行为则要结合刑法的价值具体问题具体分析。实质作为义务的满足是考虑的重要因素，刑法谦抑性是考虑的必要的因素，关键是利益的衡量。     

抗战以来中共领导的机关生产之变迁

机关生产是革命根据地党政军民各机关、各团体重要的经济活动,早期以农业手工业生产为主,为打破敌人封锁、解决根据地物资匮乏问题发挥了重要作用。随着革命形势的好转,机关生产纷纷转向商业领域,出现了侵犯私营工商业、囤积居奇、破坏财经政策等现象,机关生产的积极作用已退居其次。为此上级政府采取种种措施予以限制和打击,但都收效甚微,直到1952年政务院第126次政务会议通过决定,果断停止了机关生产。     

试论国家对健康权与药品知识产权保护制度的平衡简

健康权在任何与健康熙护议题有关的政策上（包括药品知识产权制度）都不可忽略.然而, 《多哈宣言与2003年决议仍未触及药品知识产权保障与健康权冲突的核心问题,这就需要将健康权作为一项政策工具对药品知识产权的影响做补充性的解释.国家保障药物获得权利的义务应根据其实质内涵的多样性与复杂性掺入防卫权的特色；换言之,药品获得权应区分为国家仅有义务渐进实现的受益权与国家有义务立即实现的受益权.这种通过细化国家保障药品获得权的义务,在具有相同重要性的健康权及药品知识产权产生冲突时,便有足够的基础从权利本质审视两者在冲突时的平衡关系是否适当.