论苏诗评点的文献价值

苏诗数量繁多，内容丰富，评者在其评点过程中，对苏诗加添注释，考辨文本，指摘失误，帮助读者更易于阅读和理解作品，发挥出了本事批评的功能。而从文本本身来说，也是一种文献校勘工作，从而也就使得评点具有了文献价值，为我们今天研究苏轼提供了许多重要的参考资料。     

Towards consolidating democracy: The paradoxical role of democracy groups in Thailand

Civil society is thought to contribute to consolidating democracy, but exactly how this happens is not especially well understood. This article examines the recent experiences of ‘democracy groups’ in Thailand. While acknowledging there are other factors that contribute to democratic consolidation, it finds the cumulative effect of Thailand's intermediating organizations, such as democracy groups, appears to be a redistribution of information and resources in ways that are causing changes in state‐society relations, making the country more pluralistic and contributing to consolidating democracy. Democracy groups and other civil society organizations are providing a widening circle of Thais with virtually unprecedented opportunities to participate in the policy‐making process. Yet despite their accomplishments, these groups might have greater consolidating effects if they themselves adhered more to democratic norms and procedures. Nevertheless, without democracy groups and other civil society organizations, Thailand would be less democratic than it is, although democracy is not fully consolidated yet.     

膀胱功能障碍及相关残疾标准的比较研究

排尿功能状况的客观准确评估是法医临床学鉴定中的难点之一.2017年1月1日实施《人体损伤致残程度分级》标准,对膀胱损害残疾划分指标、原则与国外标准仍存在较大差异.本文比较了《人体损伤致残程度分级》与国内外其他伤残标准中膀胱损害的相关内容,提出了完善《人体损伤致残程度分级》标准相关内容的建议.同时介绍了尿流动力学检查在膀胱功能障碍鉴定中的价值.     

Disinvesting in the administrative capacity for public action

Recurring cutbacks in the public sector have received extensiveattention. Most of the emphasis has been on how to adjust to declinein support for public programs. Cutback Management andcon-tracting-out are examples of this approach. This article focuseson the negative consequence of cutbacks. It suggests that inadequateattention is being given to the decrease in the capacity of agenciesto act. An administrative disinvestment is occurring in much the sameway as it has for roads, bridges and other parts of our public infrastructure. Now, we are disinvesting in another critical social asset--our public bureau-cracies. The nature and implictions ofadminis-trative disinvestment are explord.     

人民调解与我国台湾地区乡镇市调解的比较研究

我国的人民调解制度与我国台湾地区的乡镇市调解制度同为现代国家依法建立的民间性调解制度,可纳入当代非诉讼纠纷解决机制(ADR)的范围。二者具有相同的文化传统、相似的历史背景和相近的制度、程序设计,显示出许多与西方国家调解不同的特征和理念,同时又存在意识形态、社会功能、构成和运作方式等多方面的差异。比较这两种制度,有利于相互借鉴、取长补短。同时,二者都需要适应当代社会纠纷解决和治理的需要,与时俱进地发展完善,克服自身的局限性和不足,与其他纠纷解决机制和程序形成衔接与互补,共同构成多元化纠纷解决机制。