The Troubled Renewal of the Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting Great Lakes Water Quality

Powerful constituent governments can have a significant impacton a federal nation's ability to implement international agreements.Negotiating written agreements is one strategy for achievingpolicy coordination in nations with such governments. This articleexamines the Canada-Ontario Agreement (COA) Respecting GreatLakes Water Quality, which helps Canada to meet its obligationsunder its Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement with the UnitedStates. First negotiated in 1971, COA was regularly renegotiatedwithout incident until the most recent round of negotiations,which began in 1991 and continued into 1994. The negotiatingissues that proved so contentious during this round are examined,as is the impact on the negotiations of developments on thebroader Canadian political scene.     

Constructivist Pedagogy and How We Learn: Educational Psychology Meets International Studies

Constructivism and problem-based learning are two concepts that have recently been embraced by the educational community as teachers and professors are trained to meet the needs and demands of their students and the community at large. We discuss the assumptions and premises of constructivism and problem-based learning, and the findings of a study implementing these concepts with international relations as the content in a high-tech problem-based simulation called ICONS. The findings are discussed in terms of the constructivist problem-based learning model and the application to various content fields in education.     

“Delinquent Boys”: Toward a New Understanding of “Deviant” and Transgressive Behavior in Gay Men

Cultural criminology suggests that crime, deviance, and transgression are often subcultural in nature. For this reason, cultural criminologists often focus on the simultaneous forces of cultural inclusion and social exclusion when explaining criminal, deviant, or transgressive behaviors. This is a particularly useful bricolage for examining contemporary gay deviance and transgression—behaviors that are perhaps closely linked to (if not directly caused by) the past isolation, marginalization and/or oppression of homosexuals by Western heteronormative societies. It is also useful for understanding behaviors that are the result of marginalization and oppression from other sources, namely, the gay community itself. Using subcultural theories of deviance—such as those favored by cultural criminologists—this article explores a perspective that can be used for exploring certain forms of gay deviance and transgression. First, some of the more ostensible criminological theories that satisfy a prima facie criminological inquiry will be presented and critiqued: labeling and stigma, and resistance to heteronormativity. To these will be added a new and potentially productive way of thinking that takes into consideration rule-breaking as a form of resistance to homonormative norms, values and rules.     

QUESTIONS ABOUT FAMILY COURT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT

Increasingly, family courts are seeking ways to focus limited resources on cases that require the most intervention, tailor court responses and dispute methods to each case, and account for the real differences among domestic violence cases. One of the means to that end may be the triaging or screening of cases. This article raises a number of questions about screening and urges that they be addressed by courts and communities that are considering whether and how to design a screening protocol. Issues include: How should we define domestic violence for the purposes of screening? Who should carry out the screening? How can we maximize the likelihood that we will fully assess the context of the violence in each case? How should we assess the risks or dangers inherent in the parties’ situation? How should a screening effort account for changing circumstances as a case proceeds through the courts? How can information gathered in a screening effort improperly impact subsequent decisions of the court?     

The Influence of Unobserved Factors on Position Timing and Content in the NAFTA Vote

e-mail: boehmke{at}umich.edu A variety of factors have been shown to influence position timingand the content of positions taken by legislators on importantissues. In addition to these observed factors, I argue thatunobserved factors such as behind-the-scenes lobbying and partyloyalty may also influence position timing and position content.Although hypotheses about observed factors can be tested usingtraditional methods, hypotheses about unobserved factors cannot.To test for systematic effects of unobserved factors on positiontiming and content, I develop a seemingly unrelated discrete-choiceduration estimator and apply it to data from the vote for theNorth American Free Trade Agreement. The results indicate thateven after controlling for observed factors, there is stillevidence that unobserved factors such as Presidential lobbyingand/or party loyalty influence both choices.     

Using Auxiliary Data to Estimate Selection Bias Models, with an Application to Interest Group Use of the Direct Initiative Process

Recent work in survey research has made progress in estimatingmodels involving selection bias in a particularly difficultcircumstance—all nonrespondents are unit nonresponders,meaning that no data are available for them. These models arereasonably successful in circumstances where the dependent variableof interest is continuous, but they are less practical empiricallywhen it is latent and only discrete outcomes or choices areobserved. I develop a method in this article to estimate thesemodels that is much more practical in terms of estimation. Themodel uses a small amount of auxiliary information to estimatethe selection equation parameters, which are then held fixedwhile estimating the equation of interest parameters in a maximum-likelihoodsetting. After presenting Monte Carlo analyses to support themodel, I apply the technique to a substantive problem: Whichinterest groups are likely to to be involved in support of potentialinitiatives to achieve their policy goals?