灾害救援中经济动员的流程再造

经济动员是灾害救援中的关键活动,直接影响救援效果。借鉴企业管理的流程再造理论,对灾害救援中经济动员流程的再造与重构,不仅提高了应对自然灾害和突发事件的能力,而且对提升战时经济动员能力也具有重要意义。运用流程再造理论改造灾害救援中的经济动员行动,应遵循有效性、保障性、平稳性、彻底性等原则。采用相对温和的流程管理模式有利于灾害救援中经济动员再造活动的顺利推行。     

结构性地区主义与开放性地区主义——西欧与东亚的比较

全球化浪潮下,地区主义伴随区域一体化得到迅速发展。在西欧一体化过程中,西欧国家通过重视合法协定、强调功能整合以及超国家机构的建设形成了结构性地区主义;而在东亚一体化发展中,东亚国家则强调不干涉原则,突出国家主权至上,抵制和质疑超国家机构,从而形成了弱机制化的开放性地区主义。两种性质的地区主义的成因主要在于:西欧和东亚的历史发展体系不同,导致其各自成员国之间的经济政治制度同质性程度不同,成员国之间的集体认同以及对民族国家主权的价值观存在差异。就发展趋向而言,自金融危机后,欧洲债务危机频现,暴露了规范严谨的结构性地区主义的僵化弊病,而东亚一体化过程中,东盟、10+1、10+3、东亚峰会等对话形式层出不穷,则表明了缺乏规范机制下的地区合作效率的不足。     

危机恢复管理中的执行模式与政策依从——以公民议事为解决方案的案例研究

本文分析5.12大震后农房恢复重建的案例,考察了危机恢复管理中政策执行、政策依从问题与基层民主治理之间的关系。研究分析认为,由于政府决策的专家型思维与村民社会价值观的尖锐冲突,政策执行模式的单向性与公民选择背景(context)的复杂性无法调和等,导致危机恢复政策执行的扭曲。研究结果表明,为了提升政策依从度,加速处于危机中的社会恢复,政府必须采取整合协商式政策执行模式,引导社会公众不断革新与完善治理机制,通过宣教提升政策执行者、协助者与客体的人力资本。研究同时发现突发危机这个外在动因催化了基层民主治理机制,但其长效性必须建立在不断完善的法制、机制建设的基础上。     

Democracy and Legitimacy in the Shadow of Purposive Competence

This article argues that the way EU competences are defined plays an important role in the social legitimacy problems of the EU. The fact that its powers are purposive compels the EU to privilege narrow functional goals and act in a highly focused way. This has the consequence that politics cannot be meaningful within the EU, since essential choices of direction are pre‐empted. It also has the consequence that EU law is over‐instrumental and lacks expressive qualities, alienating the public. Now that EU law is so broad, the same defects are being imposed increasingly on Member States. Without another form of conferred power, the legitimacy of the EU, and of law and government in Europe, will be increasingly undermined. The constitutional DNA, which has been a functional success for Europe, may also be its political nemesis.     

‘Any Place I Hang My Hat?’ or: Residence is the New Nationality

Abstract:  Removing all nationality discrimination means treating the emigré national like a foreigner, not just treating the foreign resident like a national. This challenges directly the idea that the national enjoys a permanent bond with his home country, wherever he may go. It also ushers in residence as an alternative to nationality as the criterion for membership of society and rights to benefits. This makes national solidarity a less discriminatory affair, and so easier to defend legally. One result may be tighter, in some ways less open societies. Yet membership of these societies will be voluntary and temporary and open to all. This argument is developed through a critical examination of recent judgments from the Court of Justice on residence conditions in national law.