Resisting Broken Windows

Political Behavior - Concurrent housing and opioid crises have increased exposure to street-crime, homelessness and addiction in American cities. What are the political consequences of this...     

COVID-19-induced governance transformation: How external shocks may spur cross-organizational collaboration and trust-based management

Persistent efforts to meet the demand for cross-organizational collaboration and trust-based management have been halted by a mixture of bureaucratic inertia and entrenched New Public Management thinking. This article explores whether the COVID-crisis has broken the reform deadlock. Based on a handful of recent surveys and interviews conducted by Danish public sector organizations, we look at the crisis-induced transformations in local public administration. The main finding is that the pandemic has forced administrative agencies to collaborate with each other to solve new and pressing problems in a turbulent environment. Similarly, it has urged public managers to trust the skills and motivation of their employees, who must solve administrative tasks in innovative ways and with limited managerial support, supervision and monitoring. While changes may amount to little more than a temporary departure from normalcy, lesson-drawing, learning retention and proactive leadership may help to produce a sustainable transformation.     

Les cabinets ministériels au Québec : pouvoirs et paradoxes

This article aims to introduce the crucial role played by ministry cabinets in the implementation of public policies in Quebec. The authors use an ethnographic perspective to present the fruit of their experience, and do so at the department level, as well as the Prime Minister’s. Within the Quebecois context, they produce a structural analysis of ministry cabinets, as well as an analysis of pertaining cultural and regulatory codes. They also expose the politic and political‐administrative relations that ascertain the progression of files produced by members of the Quebecois executive. But they observe a paradox. Although cabinets have the real ability to initiate new public policies, they operate within a complex environment, which greatly restricts their will to act. Tagging behind crisis, parliamentary work and bureaucratic resistance, they seem to act in a more reactive rather than proactive way on a daily basis.