前进中的广西民进

1949年11月,民进港九分会会员、著名作家胡明树在广州参加广西工作团到广西工作.他首先在南宁联系了一些文教界无党派爱国人士.1952年1月29日,民进南宁小组成立.6月25日,民进南宁小组改称"民进广西小组",1953年5月,成立民进广西省分会筹委会,杨东莼任筹委会主任委员,胡明树、阳太阳任副主任委员.随后,根据中共省委统战部意见,先后在桂林、南宁、梧州、贵县、容县、玉林、贺县、桂平、河池等市县建立组织.1958年10月16日,民进广西区第一次代表大会召开,大会选举产生了民进广西区第一届委员会,张景宁当选为主任委员,郑建宣当选为副主任委员.民进广西区委会正式成立.当时全区有基层组织41个,会员517人.     

Censorship,the Media,and the Market in China

Journal of Chinese Political Science - Pervasive media censorship in China is often seen as a strictly political issue. Although in past years reporters have had leeway to report on economic...     

印俄战略伙伴关系的新发展

印俄战略伙伴关系是冷战时期印苏特殊关系的继承和演进。进入21世纪以后,随着俄罗斯的复兴和印度的崛起,双方重新审视对方在各自战略棋盘上的分量,决定建立"战略伙伴关系",加强在政治、经济、军事、科技、能源等领域的合作。由于俄罗斯与中国的"战略协作伙伴关系"不断深化,印度与中国"面向和平与繁荣的战略伙伴关系"正在推进,印俄战略伙伴关系对于中国具有某种积极意义。尽管印俄对中国的态度有一定区别,但是印俄战略伙伴关系对中国的良性作用值得肯定。     

宁夏60年城市化建设的巨大成就

宁夏解放60周年来,尤其是近几年,宁夏党委、政府在党的民族政策指引下,在国家和兄弟市（省区）的大力支援下,团结带领全区各族人民奋发图强、艰苦创业,推进宁夏城市化跨越式发展。     

宁夏新型农村社会养老保险制度建设对策研究

在贯彻中央有关精神和落实国家基本政策的前提下,宁夏新型农村社会养老保险制度建设要充分考虑宁夏各地区农村经济社会发展的实际,制定符合宁夏各级财政、村集体、农民个人承担能力的新型农村养老保险制度。     

发挥农村现代远程教育作用的实践和建议

乌鲁木齐市农村党员干部现代远程教育工作自2005年开展以来健康推进,在农村党员群众学习和生产实践中发挥了重要作用。本文认真分析了在鸟鲁木齐市农村党员干部现代远程教育工作中还存在的一些问题以及原因,对其今后的发展提出了建议。     

与祖国共奋进——庆祝北京市工会干部学院建校60周年

2009年是北京市工会干部学院建校60周年,走过了与祖国共奋进的辉煌历程.60年来,北京市工会干部学院实现了一次又一次历史跨越,工会干部教育培训稳步推进,首都职工素质教育工程方兴未艾,成人学历教育和社会教育成果丰硕,校园文明建设欣欣向荣.在新的历史起点上,学院将以视野开阔的战略思维、勇于创新的开拓精神、忠于职守的责任理念和务实高效的科学管理,为北京市的工会教育事业做出更大的贡献.     

Quadratic voting as an input to cost-benefit analysis

When agencies regulate, they must calculate the costs and benefits of their regulations. To do this, they must often price non-market goods—for instance, the value of protecting wildlife or the environment. Regulators have typically relied upon contingent valuation surveys to put prices on these types of goods. But contingent valuation surveys are fraught with error and often give rise to implausible valuations that cannot be trusted. Quadratic voting offers a better solution. Agencies should hold quadratic votes over nonmarket goods and use those votes to price the goods at issue.     

Where Do We Go from Here?

The left needs a fundamental rethinking of its politics for a new era. The first task is to understand the contemporary conjuncture: the dynamic combination of events and circumstances which structure a political settlement. Two such conjunctures have occurred in recent history. The first produced the postwar welfare settlement of 1945, which broke down in the economic crisis of the 1970s. The second took shape in the 1980s around the revival of liberal market economics and what became known as Thatcherism. It failed following the 2008 financial crash, and has begun to break apart with the vote to leave the EU. New political and cultural faultlines are confounding the orthodoxies of the governing class and cutting across the partisan loyalties of the main political parties. They herald the renewal of politics. But Labour is on the edge of an abyss. This article considers what the left can learn from Labour's previous periods of defeat and revisionism, and suggests where—if it survives—it should go next.     

Who Votes for the Future? Information,Expectations, and Endogeneity in Economic Voting

Voters’ four primary evaluations of the economy—retrospective national, retrospective pocketbook, prospective national, and prospective pocketbook—vary in the cognitive steps necessary to link economic outcomes to candidates in elections. We hypothesize that the effects of the different economic evaluations on vote choice vary with a voter’s ability to acquire information and anticipate the election outcome. Using data from the 1980 through 2004 US presidential elections, we estimate a model of vote choice that includes all four economic evaluations as well as information and uncertainty moderators. The effects of retrospective evaluations on vote choice do not vary by voter information. Prospective economic evaluations weigh in the decisions of the most informed voters, who rely on prospective national evaluations when they believe the incumbent party will win and on prospective pocketbook evaluations when they are uncertain about the election outcome or believe that the challenger will win. Voters who have accurate expectations about who will win the election show the strongest relationship between their vote choice and sociotropic evaluations of the economy, both retrospective and prospective. Voters whose economic evaluations are most likely to be endogenous to vote choice show a weaker relationship between economic evaluations and their votes than the voters who appear to be more objective in their assessments of the election. Economic voting is broader and more prospective than previously accepted, and concerns about endogeneity in economic evaluations are overstated.