首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1451篇
  免费   56篇
各国政治   68篇
工人农民   63篇
世界政治   126篇
外交国际关系   84篇
法律   708篇
中国共产党   1篇
中国政治   46篇
政治理论   402篇
综合类   9篇
  2021年   9篇
  2020年   22篇
  2019年   27篇
  2018年   50篇
  2017年   56篇
  2016年   44篇
  2015年   33篇
  2014年   53篇
  2013年   227篇
  2012年   42篇
  2011年   62篇
  2010年   40篇
  2009年   35篇
  2008年   57篇
  2007年   54篇
  2006年   66篇
  2005年   54篇
  2004年   57篇
  2003年   54篇
  2002年   34篇
  2001年   21篇
  2000年   18篇
  1999年   19篇
  1998年   16篇
  1997年   15篇
  1996年   11篇
  1995年   17篇
  1994年   21篇
  1993年   17篇
  1992年   12篇
  1991年   11篇
  1990年   9篇
  1989年   14篇
  1988年   18篇
  1987年   15篇
  1986年   7篇
  1985年   17篇
  1984年   9篇
  1983年   13篇
  1982年   13篇
  1981年   7篇
  1979年   10篇
  1978年   13篇
  1977年   9篇
  1976年   11篇
  1975年   13篇
  1974年   11篇
  1973年   8篇
  1972年   11篇
  1967年   8篇
排序方式: 共有1507条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
961.
962.
Invalid expert witness testimony that overstated the precision and accuracy of forensic science procedures has been highlighted as a common factor in many wrongful conviction cases. This study assessed the ability of an opposing expert witness and judicial instructions to mitigate the impact of invalid forensic science testimony. Participants (N = 155) acted as mock jurors in a sexual assault trial that contained both invalid forensic testimony regarding hair comparison evidence, and countering testimony from either a defense expert witness or judicial instructions. Results showed that the defense expert witness was successful in educating jurors regarding limitations in the initial expert's conclusions, leading to a greater number of not-guilty verdicts. The judicial instructions were shown to have no impact on verdict decisions. These findings suggest that providing opposing expert witnesses may be an effective safeguard against invalid forensic testimony in criminal trials.  相似文献   
963.
Abstract

Contemporary feminism has reached a difficult crossroads, both in its theory and practical application. Feminist commitment to diversity and inclusion has opened space for women not traditionally considered in feminism’s domain and prompted new understandings of the forms of power against which women struggle. However, the very inclusivity of contemporary feminism now raises a series of unresolved issues. What does it mean to be a feminist today? What are the criteria for integration within a feminist agenda? And who determines the boundaries of inclusion and exclusion? This article uses the case of Jihadi brides, women who travel to join the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, to test the limits of feminist boundaries. That these women have embarked on a radical political campaign against the West prompts further revisioning of the relationship between women, gender, and feminism. In place of a unified feminist politics, women are involved today on both sides of the global conflict between Western industrialized democracy (and its allies) and violent jihadism. In this context, should feminism include all women, even those who fight against Western values and thus the rights of other women? Should feminism tolerate the intolerant? Against the background of debates about intersectionality, identity politics, and post-structuralism, this article raises the specter of a feminism that is not only non-Western but, importantly, anti-Western and considers its implications for a feminist reconstructive agenda.  相似文献   
964.
Bailey  James B.  Thomas  Diana W.  Anderson  Joseph R. 《Public Choice》2019,180(1-2):91-103
Public Choice - A growing body of literature analyzing the distributive consequences of regulation suggests that regulation may have particularly detrimental effects on lower-income households....  相似文献   
965.
966.
967.
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique -  相似文献   
968.
Legal context. Companies which have seen their IP rights infringedacross Europe have, in recent years, been keen to obtain cross-borderrelief from infringement through bringing a single action inthe court of just one EU Member State. This approach has time,cost and tactical advantages for claimants, but raises complexjurisdictional questions. Key points. This article provides an in-depth explanation ofthe framework for litigating IP rights in the European Union.It describes the various interpretations to which the BrusselsRegulation on Jurisdiction has been subjected and how they affectthe availability of cross-border relief. This explanation providesa foundation for analysing the recent ECJ decisions in Gat vLuk and Roche v Primus. Practical significance. Cross-border jurisdiction and reliefis, in practice, no longer available in respect of registeredrights.  相似文献   
969.
‘A book may be good for nothing; or there may be onlyone thing in it worth knowing; are we to read it all through?’(Samuel Johnson) This section is dedicated to the review ofideas, articles, books, films and other media. It will includereplies (and rejoinders) to articles, the evaluation of newideas or proposals, and reviews of books and articles both directlyand indirectly related to intellectual property law.
Domain Name Law and  相似文献   
970.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号