道地药材地理标志保护体系的反思与重塑

目前我国道地药材地理标志保护体系实行三轨制并存的保护模式,极易导致同一道地药材上几种地理标志之间的权利冲突。同时,由于三种保护制度各自存在弊端,我们无法通过简单的保留一种制度、取消其他两种来解决问题。对此,本文参考借鉴国外先进的立法经验,提出应将现行的三轨制保护模式整合成一套体系化的、完善的道地药材地理标志保护制度,并从保护模式的选择和制度内容的完善两个层面提出了具体建议。     

视频聚合平台的直接侵权认定探究

在服务器原则的影响下,司法审判实务关于聚合平台的深度链接行为法律定性分歧很大,各地法院的判决互相矛盾.笔者在梳理目前法院的典型做法的基础上,通过对深度链接的技术分析,详细论述了服务器原则及《反不正当竞争法》在此问题上的保护不足,认为聚合平台是一种直接提供内容服务的信息网络传播行为,应当承担直接侵权的法律责任.     

Promote Shanghai Spirit and Spark People's Wisdom for building a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind——A Summary of the First Shanghai Cooperation Organization People's Forum

正The whole year’s work depends on a good start in spring.On 9 to 10 April 2018,the historic city Xi’an witnessed the staging of the First People’s Forum of Shanghai Cooperation Organization     

老挝禁毒政策的历史演变

老挝在长达200余年的毒品种植历史上,其禁毒政策亦随着政治、经济因素的变动而经历了缺失时期、初步制定与忽视时期、重视与完善时期三个不同历史时期的演变,而经济因素始终左右着老挝禁毒政策的制定与实行。     

Partnerships From A Fair Perspective

<正>Northeast China grows trade ties with neighbors for regional development Nikolai Chen is a Russian farmer who raises an unusual livestock-wood frogs,the brown or pink variety that lives in moist woodlands and is used in traditional Chinese medicine(TCM).The 43-year-old made his way to Changchun,capital of northeast China’s Jilin Province,which sits near the boundary with     

马克思主义生态文化观视域下国家生态治理现代化的逻辑起点与实践路向

本文立足国家生态治理现代化这一内嵌于国家治理现代化进程中的重大问题,以马克思主义生态文化观作为理论逻辑起点,探寻国家生态治理现代化的实践路向。本文认为以生态治理体系和治理能力现代化为目标的习近平生态治理观所提供的"中国实践",从生态治理制度体系建设、多元主体参与的生态治理格局的构建、平等均衡的全球生态治理系统的推动等方面为国家生态治理现代化提供了思想引领,是激发国家生态治理效能的根本之道,因而也将是一场人类文明的生态转向意义上的理论创新和实践创新。     

Miscarriages of Justice and the Discourse of Innocence: Perspectives from Appellants,Campaigners, Journalists,and Legal Practitioners

This article problematizes the discourse of innocence in relation to victims of wrongful conviction operating within the criminal justice system. For appellants whose convictions have been quashed by the Court of Appeal, notions of innocence are often at odds with how others perceive and understand the purpose of criminal trials and appeals. This article will examine the views of legal practitioners, journalists, and victims of wrongful conviction and their supporters regarding factual innocence and how misunderstanding can sometimes lead to miscommunication by actors operating within the same system. The article will further examine the issue of compensation in light of the recent ruling by the Supreme Court and conclude that the current debate regarding what constitutes a miscarriage of justice continues to confuse legal practitioners and prolong the anxiety suffered by victims recovering from the trauma of wrongful imprisonment and subsequent losses.