The implementation of the EU Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC)(the ‘Directive’) has resulted in significant changesand new opportunities for many issuers of securities in theEuropean Capital Markets. The Directive and its subordinatelegislation, Commission Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 (the ‘EURegulation’) requires, as did the previous EU legislation,that a prospectus, containing certain required disclosure, beapproved by an EEA competent authority and published beforesecurities are offered to the public or admitted to an EEA-regulatedmarket. But, in doing so, it introduces important changes thatwill, its architects hope, result in a more active cross-borderretail market in securities within the EEA. These changes includea common language regime, under which, in cross-border situations,an English language version of the prospectus will normallybe valid for admission to regulated markets or a public offeranywhere in the EEA, thus avoiding expensive and time-consumingmultiple translations. It also provides . . . [Full Text of this Article]   1. Introduction2. French highlightsApproval of the prospectusScopeContent of prospectusesRisk factorsLanguageResponsibility for prospectusesPublicationInformation to be provided within prospectuses3. Summary   1. Introduction2. Scope of application of the securities Prospectus Act3. ‘Frequent issuer exemption’4. Publication rules5. Prospectus supplement and investor withdrawal right6. Summary   1. Introduction2. Implementation3. Competent authorityListing rules/prospectus rulesUnregulated offers4. Responsibility/liability5. Summary   1. Introduction2. Implementation3. National variations from the Directive4. Practical impact5. Summary   1. Introduction2. Regulatory framework3. Luxembourg Prospectus Directive options4. Public offers of securities5. Summary   1. Introduction2. Definition of ‘security’3. Concept of ‘offer’4. Supplemental prospectus and withdrawal rights5. Published prospectus identical to approved prospectus6. Six days rule7. Language8. Public offer exemption9. Summary   1. Introduction2. The RDL 53. The CNMV notice4. The RD 13105. The order 35376. Summary   1. Introduction2. Standardized prospectus content requirements3. The Official List of the FSA (the ‘Official List’)4. Official List eligibility requirements5. The Alternative Investment Market (‘AIM’)6. Withdrawal rights7. Draft prospectuses8. Qualified investor exemption9. Summary  相似文献   
112.
113.
Non-Sexual Delinquency in Juvenile Sexual Offenders: The Mediating and Moderating Influences of Emotional Empathy     
John A. Hunter  Aurelio Jose Figueredo  Judith V. Becker  Neil Malamuth 《Journal of family violence》2007,22(1):43-54
The theoretical linkage of empathy to sexually aggressive and antisocial behavior is reviewed, and assessment conducted on the role of emotional empathy in the non-sexual delinquent behavior of juvenile sexual offenders. In examination of developmental antecedents of empathy, self-reported parental attachment and positive fathering experiences were found to be positively associated with emotional empathy, while reported exposure to violence against females was inversely related. As hypothesized, emotional empathy was found to have both mediating and moderating influences on risk of engagement in non-sexual delinquency. Emotional empathy was found to be negatively associated with non-sexual delinquency and to partially mediate the positive influences of exposure to violence against females and hostile masculinity. Emotional empathy was also found to function as a moderator of hostile masculinity, with high empathy levels associated with an attenuated positive effect of hostile masculinity on non-sexual delinquency, and low levels with an accentuated effect. Possible mechanisms for this moderating influence are discussed, along with clinical implications of the findings and directions for future research.  相似文献   
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
The implementation of the EU Transparency Obligations Directive--a country-by-country analysis     
Sebire  Marc-Etienne; Sebastien  Julien; Gehringer  Axel; Cuccia  Stefano; Byers  David; Wagner  Henri; Thomas  Anne-Marie; Zijp  Petra; van Straaten  Matthieu; Cuenca  Jose Manuel; Azanza  Yolanda; Bushner  Daniel; Parry  Jonathan 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(2):186-216
Dr Axel Gehringer Hengeler Mueller Stefano Cuccia Head of Market Supervision, TLX, Milan David Byers McCann FitzGerald, Solicitors, Dublin Henri Wagner and Anne-Marie Thomas Allen & Overy, Luxembourg Petra Zijp and Matthieu van Straaten NautaDutilh NV, Amsterdam José Manuel Cuenca and Yolanda Azanza Clifford Chance Daniel Bushner and Jonathan Parry Ashurst, London The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
  In our first issue, we included a comparative review that comparedhow the Prospectus Directive had been implemented in variousEuropean Economic Area (EEA) Member States. That Directive setsout the requirements for initial disclosure, through a prospectus,of the information an investor requires to make its initialinvestment decision, when transferable securities are offeredto the public or admitted to an EEA-regulated market. Some 18months later, we turn to the legislative companion piece—theTransparency Obligations Directive or Directive 2004/109/EC(known familiarly as the ‘TD’ or sometimes, butonly outside Germany, as ‘TOD’—in this articlethe abbreviation ‘TD’ will be used throughout).This is an important Directive that is designed to achieve anumber of objectives. First, it recognizes that markets depend on information. Itis not enough that issuers describe their business and financialposition to the market only when they ask for new money by issuingsecurities. . . . [Full Text of this Article]   1. Introduction2. Regulated informationRegulated information under French lawLanguage of the regulated informationEffective and complete distribution3. Periodic informationReports on financial informationOther information4. Ongoing informationInformation about major holdingsInformation for holders of securities   1. Introduction2. State of origin concept and domestic issuer concept3. Periodic information requirementsGeneralResponsibility and liability for periodic information4. Ongoing information requirements5. Summary   1. Introduction: the legal context2. Key points of implementation in ItalyThe Italian liability regime for market disclosure3. Concluding summary   1. Introduction2. Competent authority3. Liability4. Jurisdictional scope of liability5. Responsibility6. Major shareholdings   1. Introduction2. Periodic information requirementsAnnual financial statementsHalf-yearly financial statementsInterim management statements and quarterly financial statementsLiability3. Ongoing information requirementsImportant participations notificationVoting rights modification notificationNotification and publication procedureOwn sharesAdditional (general) information obligations of issuers of shares4. Competent authorityNotification of the CSSFAdditional information and sanctionsThird country exemption5. Language and media6. Timing7. Conclusion   1. Introduction2. Super-equivalent rules3. Periodical information4. LiabilityIssuerDirectors5. Rules on disclosure of major shareholdings6. Conclusion   1. Introduction2. Law 6/20073. RD 1362Periodic informationResponsibility and liabilityContent of financial reportsInformation on major holdings and own sharesNotification of the acquisition or disposal of major holdingsAcquisition or disposal of a major proportion of voting rightsProcedures for notificationOwn sharesGeneral provisionsAccess to regulated informationLanguagesOther information obligationsRemuneration schemes4. Summary   1. Introduction2. Periodic financial reporting requirementsSuper equivalent applicationOther points to notePeriodic financial reporting and non-UK issuers3. Major shareholding notification regimeSuper equivalent applicationContracts for differenceOther points to noteMajor shareholding notification and non-UK issuers4. Summary  相似文献   
119.
International environmental agreements between developing countries only: learning from the Brazil–Uruguay case over the suspicion of acid rain     
Daniel Enrique Rótulo Decuadra  Jose Antonio Puppim de Oliveira 《International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics》2008,8(4):389-408
This article is about the process of negotiation and implementation of a bilateral environmental agreement between two developing countries. It analyzes the case of the Act of Jaguarão between Brazil and Uruguay on assessing the risk of transboundary air pollution by the President Medici (UTPM) coal-powered thermo-electrical facility in the Candiota region of southern Brazil. The article adds to the scarce literature on international environmental conflict resolution and negotiations between developing countries, especially in Latin America. First, it explains that even with the asymmetry of power between Brazil and Uruguay, negotiation was possible due to a series of factors, such as the interest of Brazilian environmental agencies in improving the monitoring of emissions from UTPM and the international scrutiny of Brazil prior to the upcoming Rio-92 Earth Summit. Both states obtained mutual gains from the agreement by developing ‘joint fact finding’ research and monitoring. Second, different from most of the mainstream literature, the research reveals that weaknesses in institutional agreements, such as a lack of sanctions or deadlines, were not an implementation impediment. In fact, the very weaknesses of the agreement actually enabled authorities in both countries to cooperate in the development of an acid rain monitoring program in the Candiota region, and as a result, to improve air monitoring capacities in both countries. Third, this research shows that the implementation process (1991–2003) produced different results and impacts: it helped to develop technical capacities of environmental agencies in both countries, increased the political power of Brazilian environmental agencies to control UTPM, and pushed for behavioral changes to enable UTPM to respond to the demands of both governments.  相似文献   
120.
Building assets to reduce vulnerability: microfinance provision by a rural working people's union in Mexico     
Ben Rogaly  Alfonso Castillo  Martha Romero Serrano 《Development in Practice》2004,14(3):381-395
Proyecto Tequisquiapan (PT) provides protective microfinance services in a small region of rural Mexico, including, importantly, open access to deposit facilities. The authors report on new research which examined PT's record in enabling people with different degrees of vulnerability to build assets and protect themselves from both sudden shocks and more predictable demands for lump sums of cash. Proyecto Tequisquiapan was found to be relatively more useful for the most vulnerable households. Its successes rely on its small scale and on the commitment of its staff, whose salaries are subsidised, to innovation and experimentation in order to remain relevant to members' changing and differentiated financial lifeworlds. This stands in contrast to the current trend towards large‐scale commercialised microfinance. The World Bank, the authors argue, should take note.  相似文献   
[首页] « 上一页 [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] 12 [13] [14] [15] [16] 下一页 » 末  页»
  首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   149篇
  免费   8篇
各国政治   6篇
工人农民   11篇
世界政治   11篇
外交国际关系   7篇
法律   81篇
中国共产党   1篇
政治理论   40篇
  2023年   3篇
  2022年   2篇
  2021年   5篇
  2020年   3篇
  2019年   4篇
  2018年   7篇
  2017年   4篇
  2016年   8篇
  2015年   6篇
  2014年   6篇
  2013年   22篇
  2012年   7篇
  2011年   6篇
  2010年   10篇
  2009年   3篇
  2008年   9篇
  2007年   6篇
  2006年   7篇
  2005年   7篇
  2004年   9篇
  2003年   4篇
  2002年   2篇
  2001年   3篇
  1999年   1篇
  1998年   3篇
  1997年   2篇
  1996年   1篇
  1994年   1篇
  1988年   1篇
  1983年   2篇
  1976年   1篇
  1975年   1篇
  1974年   1篇
排序方式: 共有157条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
111.
Dr. Axel Gehringer HengelerMueller David Byers McCann FitzGerald, Solicitors, Dublin, Ireland Stefano Cuccia Head of Regulation, TLX, Milan Henri Wagner Allen and Overy, Luxembourg Petra Zijp NautaDutilh, Amsterdam José Manuel Cuenca and Yolanda Azanza Clifford Chance Daniel Bushner and Jonathan Parry Ashurst, London The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
   Editor's Note    France    Germany    Ireland    Italy    Luxembourg    Netherlands    Spain    United Kingdom    Editor's Note    France    Germany    Italy    Ireland    Luxembourg    The Netherlands    Spain    United Kingdom
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号