全文获取类型
收费全文 | 2341篇 |
免费 | 78篇 |
专业分类
各国政治 | 202篇 |
工人农民 | 117篇 |
世界政治 | 272篇 |
外交国际关系 | 185篇 |
法律 | 977篇 |
中国政治 | 31篇 |
政治理论 | 623篇 |
综合类 | 12篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 10篇 |
2022年 | 9篇 |
2021年 | 8篇 |
2020年 | 32篇 |
2019年 | 38篇 |
2018年 | 62篇 |
2017年 | 69篇 |
2016年 | 67篇 |
2015年 | 51篇 |
2014年 | 59篇 |
2013年 | 405篇 |
2012年 | 48篇 |
2011年 | 74篇 |
2010年 | 61篇 |
2009年 | 77篇 |
2008年 | 77篇 |
2007年 | 74篇 |
2006年 | 71篇 |
2005年 | 65篇 |
2004年 | 88篇 |
2003年 | 61篇 |
2002年 | 61篇 |
2001年 | 45篇 |
2000年 | 54篇 |
1999年 | 37篇 |
1998年 | 56篇 |
1997年 | 51篇 |
1996年 | 33篇 |
1995年 | 43篇 |
1994年 | 41篇 |
1993年 | 52篇 |
1992年 | 33篇 |
1991年 | 30篇 |
1990年 | 36篇 |
1989年 | 28篇 |
1988年 | 31篇 |
1987年 | 33篇 |
1986年 | 27篇 |
1985年 | 34篇 |
1984年 | 22篇 |
1983年 | 18篇 |
1982年 | 18篇 |
1981年 | 20篇 |
1980年 | 17篇 |
1979年 | 10篇 |
1977年 | 11篇 |
1976年 | 13篇 |
1975年 | 7篇 |
1973年 | 10篇 |
1971年 | 6篇 |
排序方式: 共有2419条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
81.
Stephen Balch 《Society》2017,54(4):346-351
Karl Jaspers famously characterized the period from the beginning of the eighth to the end of the third century before Christ as an “Axial Age” in which intellectual freedom and creativity blossomed as never before. This article argues that it was followed, five hundred years later, by an “Anti-Axial Age”, which devised a novel formula for intellectual and political repression. Its essence was the state’s capture of the millenial narrative, which had first been developed as religious doctrine within Zoroastrianism and Christianity. Involving the two great classical empires of Western Eurasia, Persia and Rome, and then empowering the expansion of Islam, the Anti-Axial Age left an ideological legacy that continues to haunt the contemporary world. 相似文献
82.
83.
84.
Tom Allen 《The Journal of legal history》2018,39(2):187-215
In 1893, Prime Minister Gladstone introduced the second Irish home rule bill in parliament. The bill broke with tradition in Britain and the empire, as it included provisions from the bill of rights of the United States. Its significance was clear at the time: it was debated for nine days in the committee stage and, with one minor amendment, it remained part of the bill that passed the Commons. However, the bill was defeated in the Lords and, at least in the United Kingdom, bills of rights were dismissed as unnecessary or detrimental to sound governance until well after the second world war. This article therefore tries to understand how this early bill of rights was regarded at the time. Who suggested, or demanded, its inclusion? How did they expect it to be applied? And how did the debate reflect and influence thinking about constitutional law in Britain and the empire? 相似文献
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.