Hypostasis-induced changes in the breast area

When the anterior thoracic wall is within the hypostatic area, postmortem lividity in the region of the nipples and their immediate vicinity is less intense or absent. Where hypostatic skin haemorrhages (so-called vibices) are present, these are also found outside the areola of the nipple only. This phenomenon is visible not only externally, but is particularly pronounced on the cut surface. A possible explanation may be the different distribution pattern of connective tissue, smooth muscles and blood vessels inside and outside the areola mammae. Based on 13 cases from the forensic autopsy material--mostly drug related deaths--the macromorphological findings and their histological correlates are presented.     

Evidence for use of electroshock devices

The authors tested whether use of an electro shock weapon (stun gun) leaves marks on skin which can be found in an exterior examination. On pig skin such marks could not be produced postmortally. An experiment on one of the authors caused reddish skin marks which persisted for about 2 h. Inability to act as promised by the weapons' manufacturers did not occur in our experiments, exactly as previously described by other authors. Use of an air tester which shoots barbed electrodes ought to produce bleedings if the electrodes actually penetrate the skin.     

The emperor has no clothes: examining the employee exception to the anti-referral laws

The Anti-Referral laws are omnipresent in the practice of health law. Perhaps as a result of their wide scope in application, those laws have had a number of unintended consequences. This Article closely examines one aspect of those laws: the exception applicable to otherwise forbidden conduct that takes place between employer and employee. The author concludes that this exception does nothing to advance the policy of the laws, has led to much confusion, and has had the unintended consequence of accelerating the business consolidation of physicians with each other and with clinics and hospitals. Consequently, she asserts that this exception should be repealed.     

The collision of healthcare and corporate law in a hospital closure case

This Article analyzes potential conflicts that arise from both the judicial and administrative approval processes that govern the closure of charitable hospitals through a sale of all or substantially all of their assets. Examining the recent closure attempt by the Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital as an example, the Article highlights the various public health and corporate law issues that are raised when a not-for-profit hospital seeks closure. The Article thoroughly discusses both the statutorily and judicially required approval schemes applicable to the closure of charitable hospitals. The Article also suggests ways in which these conflicts might be avoided or remedied, as well as gives advice regarding hospital board decisionmaking.     

Legal considerations of sleep deprivation among resident physicians

Medical training in the United States often takes the form of a grueling endurance test in which patients are often those most at risk. This Article discusses sleep deprivation among resident physicians in the United States with an eye towards resolving the problem through legal channels. It analyzes the effects of sleep deprivation on resident physicians, with subsequent discussion of the implications for patient care and medical training. Next, it makes comparisons to medical training in other developed nations, as well as regulations that exist in the airline and trucking industries, where public safety is a principal concern. Furthermore, this Article discusses proposals to mend the dilemmas created by sleep-deprived resident physicians through statutory and regulatory reform, deterrence by way of tort law, and unionization or collective bargaining.     

Doctors as fiduciaries--revisiting the past with an eye on the future

A substantial proportion of the body of literature dealing with the question of whether or not a doctor stands in a fiduciary relationship with a patient in Australia assumes or asserts that this should be the case, despite strong indications to the contrary in Australian case law. Three key bases for making such assertions, the internationalist, revisionist and remedialist approaches, are identified and critiqued. It is argued that each of these approaches to justifying the characterisation of the doctor-patient relationship as a fiduciary one is flawed and unlikely to meet with success in future litigation. Additionally, there are issues of economic and resource allocation conflict in doctor-patient relationships. The implications for these conflicts in the doctor-patient fiduciary debate are briefly considered. It is concluded that, contrary to the dominant assertion in the extant literature on the subject, in Australia at least, the scales tip against, rather than towards, the characterisation of the doctor-patient relationship as a fiduciary one.