“两个先锋队”思想是对马克思主义政党性质学说的继承和发展

"两个先锋队"思想是对马克思主义政党性质学说的继承和发展.其继承体现为:坚持了基本原则;继承了动态发展观;是历史经验的科学总结.其发展表现在:新的概括表述;历史经验的新启发;解决了历史性课题;突破了传统框框.文中还从指导思想和价值取向、实践"三个代表"、加强党的自身建设三个方面陈述了在新世纪里如何当好"两个先锋队"问题.     

陕西国有资产管理体制和运行机制研究

陕西国有资产管理体制构想:统一归属,分类监管;党政一体,“三管”结合;政企分开,三层营运;属地纳税,收益分流。资本运营应规范和有效控制授权监督机制、“三管”结合机制、业积考核与评价机制。     

以"三个代表"重要思想为指导把党校学员的党性锻炼提高到一个新水平——认真学习贯彻江泽民同志"七一"讲话精神

江泽民同志在庆祝中国共产党成立80周年大会上的讲话,系统总结了我们党80年的光辉历程和基本经验,全面阐述了"三个代表"重要思想的科学内涵,深刻回答了在新的历史条件下加强和改进党的建设需要解决的重大问题,进一步指明了党在新世纪的历史任务和奋斗目标.江泽民同志的重要讲话,紧紧围绕在新的历史条件下建设一个什么样的党和怎样建设党这个基本问题,突出强调了提高党的执政能力和领导水平、提高拒腐防变和抵御风险能力这两大历史性课题,对于全面推进党的建设这个新的伟大工程具有重要的指导作用和深远影响.     

Technology and Criminal Justice

The extent and use of technology in the British criminal justice system is uneven. Two areas are examined; first where technology is used in prisons or by the police, and secondly when it is used to develop new sanctions, as with electronic monitoring, or as attachments to existing sanctions such as drug testing. Technology in prisons is mainly in the form of perimeter security, and in the police through CCTV cameras or databases. In the second the emphasis is on tracker systems which gives the supervisor greater control. Technological development in criminal justice is not without its critics. Some regard existing technological developments with suspicion, seeing them as a means of enhancing control, or as an attack on traditional liberal values, or more importantly as an extension of a form of behaviourism which is concerned only with the observable act. Others note the expensive failures of technology where systems fail to work or are delivered late. It is suggested a Government study is required to examine existing technologies and its likely future impact whether on the criminal justice system generally or on those working within it or as inmates.     

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE TO STUDY FAMILY ISSUES IN THE ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT

Justice 2002, a strategic agenda for the Arizona court system over the next five years, has the goal to build public trust confidence in the Arizona courts. A focus of Justice 2002 is the protection of children, families, and communities. One of the number of projects that have been initiated is the establishment of The Committee to Study Family Issues in the Superior Court (Committee). On October 22, 1997, Chief Justice Thomas A. Zlaket established the Committee and charged the members to: "[E]xamine the manner in which cases involving family issues, including cases involving minor children, presently are processed and determined in the Superior Court,… leading to improvement in the manner in which these cases are resolved in the court system; and report to the Arizona Judicial Council its findings and recommendations…" This article is a summarization of the Final Report presented to the Arizona Judicial Council (AJC) in December, 1998. The reader will find that the report is rather general. The Committee has functioned under the assumption that an implementation committee would be formed to work out the details, should the AJC choose to adopt the recommendation to establish a Family Court in Arizona.     

Ambassadors in the community? Labour Party members in society

A political party's members are its ambassadors in the wider community. Based on a survey of Labour party members in Nuneaton, this article investigates the extent to which party members qua party members are visible amongst their friends and colleagues. It finds that there are few closet Labour party members. Most are known to friends and (slightly less commonly) colleagues. Party members also articulate a political message, discussing politics with friends and work colleagues. Around half of party members believe that they influence others as a result of their discussions; of those who are asked their opinions by friends, almost three-quarters believe that they influence others. Labour party members in Nuneaton are thus a visible and articulate manifestation of the party. The article ends by considering whether this is likely to be true in other constituencies, for other parties, and at other times.     

Globalization and the erosion of democracy

Despite the apparent development and spread of liberal democratic state forms in the 1980s and 1990s, possibilities for genuine democratic governance overall are declining. Firstly, the emergence and consolidation of modern liberal democracy was inextricably intertwined with the development of the nation–state and is profoundly socially embedded in that structural context. Secondly, in today's globalizing world, cross–cutting and overlapping governance structures and processes increasingly take private, oligarchic (and mixed public/ private) forms; hegemonic neoliberal norms are delegitimizing state–based governance in general; and democratic states are losing the policy capacity necessary for transforming democratically generated inputs into authoritative outputs. Consequently, robust constraints limit the potential for (a) reinstitutionalizing the 'democratic chain' between accountability and effectiveness, (b) rearticulating the multitasking character of authoritative institutions and (c) renewing the capacity of authoritative agents to make the side–payments and to undertake the monitoring necessary to control free–riding and assimilate alienated groups. Rather than a new pluralistic global civil society, globalization is more likely to lead to a growth in inequalities, a fragmentation of effective governance structures and the multiplication of quasi–fiefdoms reminiscent of the Middle Ages.     

The rise and fall of the legal expert system†

Those very few of us who were critical of the rise of legal expert systems in the early 1980s probably wonder, in idle moments, whether there is a possibility of rejuvenation of an approach which was once multi-various and is now obscure and esoteric. Is it possible that after rising and falling, that legal expert system research programme could rise again? What were the conditions which gave impetus to the field and could they be repeated? In this article I want to return, with a personal viewpoint, on the rise of expert systems and why - despite their failure - the appeal of commoditising legal expertise continues to allure the unwary.     

中关村科技园区石景山园非公企业党建工作的调查与思考

当前随着非公有制经济迅速发展,非公企业党建工作变得更加重要.为了解相关情况,推进非公经济的党建工作,本课题组对中关村科技园区石景山园进行了专题调研.调研显示,在园区党工委的努力下,园内非公企业党建工作取得了一定成效,但离党组织全面覆盖非公企业、党的活动成为企业不可或缺的组成部分的目标还比较远.课题组提出要从求真务实的原则出发,寻找党建与非公企业共赢的切入点,适时转变工作方式,促进非公企业党建工作的顺利展开.