排序方式： 共有23条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
21.
Thom Brooks 《Criminal Law and Philosophy》2016,10(3):629-638
My book, Punishment, has three aims: to provide the most comprehensive and updated examination of the philosophy of punishment available, to advance a new theory—the unified theory of punishment—as a compelling alternative to available theories and to consider the relation of theory to practice. In his recent review article, Mark Tunick raises several concerns with my analysis. I address each of these concerns and argue they rest largely on misinterpretations which I restate and clarify here. 相似文献
22.
23.
Thom Holterman 《Contemporary Justice Review》2013,16(1):47-52
To make sense of the legal decisions courts offer, oftentimes we cannot rely on a strict judicial sense. Sometimes our explanations require us to engage in juridic-political speculation. This I call argumentative arbitrariness. This concept can serve us well in helping us to make sense of matters of justice as well as in developing critiques of legal order. 相似文献