Interest groups and state Medicaid drug programs

A simultaneous equations model is estimated to analyze the interaction between state Medicaid pharmaceutical drug reimbursement rates, drug recipients per capita, and expenditures per drug recipient. Interest groups are shown to have a strong positive impact on pharmacy reimbursement rates, which, in turn, have an impact on pharmacy participation rates and drug utilization and expenditure patterns. Finally, a strong inverse relationship exists between expenditures per recipient and program size. The results verify the existence of substantial variation in state Medicaid programs and point to potentially growing disparities as a result of current policies.     

专利间接侵权制度初论

间接侵权制度在侵权行为体系中有重要的理论价值和实践意义,专利间接侵权制度的建构应以专利间接侵权行为为重心,明确间接侵权的构成要件,以间接侵权责任为归属,并注重其在知识产权间接侵权制度领域的示范作用。     

单亲案亲权鉴定结果判定策略

目的探讨用STR基因座进行单亲鉴定出现矛盾基因座时下结论的策略。方法根据基因频率和遗传规律,推导单亲案亲权鉴定时的非父排除率。根据平均单亲非父排除率和平均突变率,用二项分布公式分别计算出现不同数目矛盾基因座时真父和假父的概率和似然率(亲权指数)。结果对STR共显性基因座,其单亲非父排除率的计算公式为:PEM=∑i=n1pi2(1-pi)2 ∑i相似文献   

法律上国家安全概念探析

近年来,学术界对国家安全的界定大多仅从国际关系的视角出发,见仁见智。我国的立法也陆续将国家安全作为一个专门术语写进了相关的法律及规范性文件。国家安全作为一个法律专门术语,对其解释不应是随意的,应当从法律上作出明确的科学界定和立法解释。国家安全表征着一国宪政法律制度的正常稳定状态,是一种特殊的法律秩序。从法律上科学界定国家安全,有助于实现国家安全法制的统一性、严肃性,也有助于开展国家安全法学理论的研究。     

试论行政问责制的伦理价值

行政问责制是民主政治的重要组成部分,其本身就是一个伦理课题,有着深厚的伦理价值：内含主权在民和平等正义的价值理念,内含对公共利益的追求,能克服经济人＂搭便车＂或机会主义行为,强调行政权力与行政责任的一致性,是政府实现行政责任的一种自律。     

论涵括（一）：一种初步探索

经验法则是司法证明中的一项基础性法则,大陆法系司法证明理论对其进行了概括论述,其理论形态具有较高的概括性、抽象性。英美国家的司法证明学者在“涵括”概念下也具体探讨了经验法则相关的内容,与大陆法系学者对经验法则的概括论述有所区别,英美学者在阐述“涵括”理论时,更注重其在证据能力和证明力评断以及具体司法推论过程中的方法论和工具作用,为我们研究经验法则的内容、作用机制提供了一个新的观察视角。     

Disputes in Japan: A cross-cultural test of the procedural justice model

Research on procedural justice has provided ample evidence that people are concerned not only with the outcome of disputes but also with the fairness of the procedures used to resolve disputes. The majority of the studies examining the importance of procedural justice have been conducted in the United States and Western European countries. This study tests the generality of the procedural justice model by examining the importance of fair procedures to people in a non-Western country, Japan. This study also examines the meaning of a fair procedure from a legal perspective. Past studies have drawn the procedural justice criteria considered from social psychology. We examine several additional criteria derived from the legal concept of due process of law. Results indicate that fair procedures are more important to subjects than fair outcomes in both a traffic accident dispute and a breach of contract case. Furthermore, across both types of disputes, fairness concerns are more important than nonfairness concerns. These results are consistent with findings from studies conducted in Western countries. A new finding that emerges from the study is that the clarity with which a procedure is formulated and presented is a strong determinant of procedural justice judgments.     

35例胰腺出血案例死亡原因分析

３５例胰腺出血案例死亡原因分析刘敏，吴家Ｃａｕｓｅｓｏｆｄｅａｔｈｏｆｐａｎｃｒｅａｓｈｅｍｏｒｒｈａｇｅ：３５ａｕｔｏｐｓｙｃａｓｅｓｒｅｐｏｒｔ￥ＬｉｕＭｉｎ；ＷｕＪｉａｗｅｎ（ＤｅｐａｒｍｅｎｔｏｆＦｏｒｅｎｓｉｃＰａｔｈｏｌｏｇｙ，ＷｅｓｔＣ...