集体行动的逻辑——以2008年重庆市出租车罢运群体性事件为例

集体行动是一个逻辑性的群体性行动。人们由于受到各种社会控制，需求长期得不到满足，在诱发因素的影响下极易产生怨恨，在情绪感染和社会动员的同时形成集体行动。在利益主体已经多元化的今天，利益表达特别是弱势群体的利益表达，已经是一个无法回避的问题，建立起相应的利益表达机制，畅通诉求表达渠道，是实现社会治理“善治”的重要环节。     

MIRACLE RESCUE

Atotal of 115 workers had been miraculously retrieved from the flooded Wangjialing Coal Mine in north China's Shanxi Province by the afternoon of April 5, after being trapped underground for more than a week. "It is a miracle in the history of Chinese mining rescues," said Luo Lin, Director of the State Administration of Work Safety, who stood waiting at the pit entrance. "The trapped miners displayed an unwavering determination to survive for eight days and eight nights."     

乡关何处——拉康哲学与禅宗思想片论

法国精神分析学家雅克·拉康运用结构语言学创造性地"重读"经典的弗洛伊德理论,揭示出主体是语言符号这个"大他者"无形强制下的奴性物。在该理论的观照下,人生最大的悲剧是,人似乎从来不是、也永远不可能是他自己。指出,禅宗思想相对于拉康的理论颇有同工之处,却更进一步解答了人的存在难题。禅本质上是洞察人生命本性的艺术,指出从奴役到自由的道路。禅宗思想帮助我们超越名言世间的假象,扫除附着在心地上的尘垢烦恼,释放生命固有的活力。     

Curing The World

<正>The WHO approves China’s vaccine regulation system The World Health Organization (WHO) said China had complied with international standards for the regulation of vaccines after it completed the assessment procedures at the end of 2010.     

关于我国对外贸易中的反倾销问题的分析

反倾销是一种贸易政策措施,也是一个重要的法律问题。由于世贸组织对反倾销问题没有明确的规定,使我国成为反倾销的严重受害国,对我国经济造成了严重的危害。本文试图探讨对我国进行反倾销的原因,并提出我国企业应对反倾销的具体对策。     

试论规范公安机关的刑事立案程序

立案是刑事诉讼中开始进行刑事侦查的必经的启动程序。作为刑事诉讼的一个独立程序,立案具有相当重要的作用。它是进入侦查或审判程序之前的一个判断程序,而这个判断程序又直接决定了对某人或某单位是否开展侦查或审判活动。立案工作当务之急是建立高效的现代化警务运行机制,健全和完善各项操作规范,不断创新,促进立案程序的规范化。     

辽宁社会安全科技问题的发展战略研究与规划

文章在辽宁省社会安全相关领域的现状分析基础上,从发展战略的角度,对社会安全科技的有关问题进行了研究,提出了科技问题研究的基本思路和框架。     

Disaster of the Earth

The new generation of migrant workers are seeking a better lifestyle in the cities Like many migrant workers,Xu Xiaojun,a 25-year-old kitchen cabinet installer who came to Beijing in 2001 from a small village in central     

浅谈工会会计的职业道德

会计职业道德的高低是会计人员素质的重要体现。一个高素质的会计人员应当做到爱岗敬业、提高专业胜任能力,这不仅是会计职业道德的主要内容,也是会计职业者遵循会计职业道德的可靠保证。倡导会计职业道德,加强会计职业道德教育,并结合会计职业活动,引导会计职业者进一步加强自身修养,提高会计专业胜任能力,有利于促进会计职业者整体素质的不断提高。     

Difficulties Confronted by ICSID Tribunals in Deciding International Investment Corruption Cases and Possible Solutions

The issue of corruption has attracted increasing attention in the study and practice of international investment law during recent years. After taking prudent consideration of the corruption defense invoked by the host states in some international investment arbitration cases involved with corruption, International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) tribunals accordingly determined the final awards. However, some parts of the arbitral jurisprudence aroused strong criticism, especially with regard to the ICSID tribunals’ reasoning that arbitrators have no jurisdiction over corruption-tainted international investments. The ICSID tribunals are legitimately supposed to exercise their jurisdiction and are lawfully obliged to probe into the nature of corrupt activities. The tribunals are strongly expected to adopt a balanced approach in deciding the merits and fairly weighing the obligations, rights, and interests of both disputing parties. It is preferable to strengthen the collaborative interaction between ICSID proceedings and domestic anti-corruption enforcement mechanisms when it comes to combating corrupt international investment activities. Existing international treaties (or specific treaty provisions) on combating corruption in international business transactions and calling for international cooperation, alongside domestic anti-corruption enforcement legislation, have actually laid solid legal foundations for the establishment of such an anti-corruption coordinative mechanism between ICSID and domestic corruption regulatory authorities on the global level.