新公共管理时代的理性官僚制

我国虽然处在西方公共管理的改革时代,但并不完全具备实行新公共管理改革的各种社会条件,应该谨慎借鉴,而且与西方发达国家成熟的官僚制相比,我国并没有建立起严格的、韦伯意义上的理性官僚制。理性官僚制更适合我国建设新型工业化国家的需要。     

“参与式财政”：国外地方治理的实践创新——以巴西阿雷格里市为参照

20世纪后期以来,“参与式财政”(Participatory Budgeting)的出现,是国外地方治理中公民个人和不同群体、不同利益的代表直接参与地方和社区公共财政的开支和投资决策的一种新的实践方式,其运作中的公开性、参与性、互动性和制度化等特点及其产生的积极成效,对我国农村基层民主发展具有重要的借鉴价值。     

On the integration of public law jurisprudence

After two to three hundred years of development, modern public laws have become more and more important, mature and integrated especially since the 20^th century. Traditionally, the dispersive and overlapping public law researches were grounded on the sectional public laws like constitutional law, administrative law, criminal law, procedural law, international public law, etc. Nevertheless, with all-around emergence of public law, the traditional research method can no longer adapt to the development needs of the modern public law. Therefore, it is quite necessary for us to create a kind of moderate unified public law between the laws and the sectional public laws, so as to do comprehensive, integrated and systematic researches on various sectional public laws. Based on the indepth argumentation about the necessity of developing unified public laws, this paper further puts forward that, to discuss an all-encompassing way about the main problems of creating the unified public laws and expect to fill the gap with it, the unified public law should define its study objectives mainly focused on the contents of integrated public law criteria, common public law features and general public law rules and so on; form its theoretical basis on the line of the relations between public power and the citizen privilege; establish its category structure found on the concept of public power and the derivative core and basic categories; and build up the disciplinary system based on the systematic integrity of the public law research results.     

刑事鉴定结论研究

本文首先对鉴定结论得以存在的理论基础进行了剖析,指出鉴定结论的作用在于补充事实裁判者在专门问题上认识能力的不足;鉴定结论是一种证据,而非最终结论;鉴定结论作为一种独立的证据形式,是职权主义诉讼模式的产物.然后对鉴定的提出、鉴定人的选任以及对当事人双方的平等对待等问题进行了分析,在介绍了这一问题上的三种不同模式之后,指出了我国目前存在的问题及解决方式.之后又对鉴定人的主要权利和义务进行了评析.最后从证据能力和证明力两个方面讨论了鉴定结论的效力.     

青年网络人际交往的心理分析及教育对策

网络人际交往与传统的交往方式不同,它具有匿名性、改变的人际吸引基础、分享有共同兴趣的虚拟空间、控制交往的时间和速度等特征。这种新的交往方式对青年心理的健康发展具有积极和消极的双重影响,应有相应的教育对策指导青年网上交往。     

中外陪审制度比较研究

我国的人民陪审制度由于法律规定过于笼统,导致人民陪审制度流于形式,陪审员“陪而不审,合而不议”。应通过明确我国人民陪审员产生方式条件、陪审案件范围,确定人民陪审员权利义务,建立专家陪审制度等来完善人民陪审制度。     

治理理论视野下的国际合作办学中大学生权益保障探析

治理理论强调公共管理主体的多元化和管理中心的多极化,该理论在中外合作办学实践中的意义就在于其为国际合作办学主体的确立和管理权力的划分提供了重要的理论依据.大学生作为合作办学中的重要主体始终得不到应有制度保障,势必造成对大学生合法权益的侵害,合作办学机构必须采取措施予以保障.     

液质联用仪自动筛选常见安眠镇静药的应用研究

目的建立快速、灵敏的常见安眠镇静药物的液质联用仪的定性筛选方法。方法采用ZORBAX sb-aq,150mm×2.1mm×3.5μm(带预柱)色谱柱;柱温:30℃;流动相:甲酸(0.1%)甲醇和甲酸(0.1%)水溶液梯度条件;流速:0.4mL/min;通过电喷雾电离,自动三级扫描质谱。结果通过软件自动处理数据,建立了57种常见安眠镇静药的质谱谱库和保留时间参数谱库。结论建立的常见安眠药谱库和分析方法具有快速、灵敏、准确的优点,不易造成漏检,并且用于实际案件检验。     

A Comparison of Logistic Regression,Classification and Regression Tree,and Neural Networks Models in Predicting Violent Re-Offending

Previous studies that have compared logistic regression (LR), classification and regression tree (CART), and neural networks (NNs) models for their predictive validity have shown inconsistent results in demonstrating superiority of any one model. The three models were tested in a prospective sample of 1225 UK male prisoners followed up for a mean of 3.31 years after release. Items in a widely-used risk assessment instrument (the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management-20, or HCR-20) were used as predictors and violent reconvictions as outcome. Multi-validation procedure was used to reduce sampling error in reporting the predictive accuracy. The low base rate was controlled by using different measures in the three models to minimize prediction error and achieve a more balanced classification. Overall accuracy of the three models varied between 0.59 and 0.67, with an overall AUC range of 0.65–0.72. Although the performance of NNs was slightly better than that of LR and CART models, it did not demonstrate a significant improvement.     

控辩平等原则下证据开示制度之反思

控辩平等原则作为现代刑事诉讼的基本理念之一，已为大多数法治发达国家所吸收。当前，中国《刑事诉讼法》面临再次修改，在考虑我国国情的基础上，应当借鉴吸收控辩平等原则的合理内涵。由于人们对其确切涵义的认识并不完全一致，导致在设计控辩关系的一些具体问题上出现违背控辩平等的主张或做法。本文拟对控辩平等的涵义进行探讨，继而反思证据开示制度，以正本清源回归理性。