知识经济时代人才流动的特点与趋势研究

知识经济的发展为人才流动带来了深刻的变化,人才流动的范围正在逐步实现从区域性向全球化方向的转变,人才流动的方式正在逐步实现从"显性流动"到"隐性流动"的转变,人才流动的方向正在逐步实现从"单向性流动"向"双向性流动"的转变,人才流动的管理模式正在逐步实现从完全市场化向政府调控下的市场化方向转变。     

浅谈认罪认罚从宽制度的四个维度——认罪认罚从宽制度问题反思

认罪认罚从宽制度从2015年提出以来,相关的法律规定也在不断完善,试点地区也提供了很多有益的经验。但是在司法实践中,认罪认罚制度的概念如何界定、认罪认罚的内涵是怎样的?认罪认罚案件与普通的刑事案件区分的核心点是什么?认罪认罚从宽制度的操作机制是怎样的……,这一系列的问题都需要进行明确。笔者在查阅了相关的文献资料、法律规定、司法案例之后,对于相关的问题有了一些粗浅的认识,认为理解认罪认罚从宽制度应当坚持从四个维度即适用之维度、证明之维、程序之维、实体之维进行把握。本文通过认罪认罚从宽制度的四个维度的分析,在厘清相关概念的基础上,对于认罪认罚从宽制度的系统化、体系化构建和完善提出一些有针对性的意见和建议。     

试构“伟大工程”中党员主体的三维空间

“党的建设伟大工程”是实现“四个伟大”的根本和核心,之于攻克当下发展矛盾问题,之于实现中华民族伟大复兴之路具有决定性作用。基于主体在系统中客观存在的自主性、主导性和能动性,本文以塑造党员主体为视角,以规矩、品德、信仰的三个维度阐述,着力构建“全面从严治党”牢固而立体的三维空间。     

比较视角下的不可靠实体清单制度

不可靠实体清单制度的基本定位是对他国歧视性的出口管制及其他制裁措施的反制。就否认和抵消他国相关国内法措施的域外适用效力而言,不可靠实体清单与欧盟阻断立法有相通之处,但运作逻辑不尽相同。本质上,不可靠实体清单制度是要对外国实体施加压力并形成威慑,促使其在遵守外国政府的管制和制裁要求时,更加中立、慎重和克制。外国实体被列入不可靠实体清单后,其所产生的法律后果可以包括进出口管制、投资限制、入境/居留限制、风险警示、民事诉讼等。不可靠实体清单制度在实施过程中应当注意原则性与灵活性相结合,赋予主管部门必要的自由裁量权,重在发挥威慑作用。同时,有关执法部门应特别注意遵照正当行政程序的要求,保障相关外国实体的申辩权和异议权。     

Measuring Trade Profile with Granular Product-Level Data

The product composition of bilateral trade encapsulates complex relationships about comparative advantage, global production networks, and domestic politics. Despite the availability of product-level trade data, most researchers rely on either the total volume of trade or certain sets of aggregated products. In this article, we develop a new dynamic clustering method to effectively summarize this massive amount of product-level information. The proposed method classifies a set of dyads into several clusters based on their similarities in trade profile—the product composition of imports and exports—and captures the evolution of the resulting clusters over time. We apply this method to two billion observations of product-level annual trade flows. We show how typical dyadic trade relationships evolve from sparse trade to interindustry trade and then to intra-industry trade. Finally, we illustrate the critical roles of our trade profile measure in international relations research on trade competition.     

Toward a Pragmatic Model of Public Responsiveness: Implications for Enhancing Public Administrators’ Responsiveness to Citizen Demands

Public responsiveness, or bureaucratic responsiveness to citizen demands, is central to public administration theories. It is a key concept regarding the appropriate role of bureaucracy and professional administrators in a democratic political system. By exploring the complexity of the concept, this article proposes a pragmatic model as an alternative to the two mainstream models of understanding public responsiveness. The theoretical implication of the pragmatic model is also discussed. Future research should address administrators’ instrumental concerns in fostering public responsiveness.     

民事诉讼认证制度中若干问题之再思考

民事诉讼认证是在我国民事审判方式改革过程中提出来的。它必须建基于辩论主义原则之上 ,其内容为对证据资料的证据能力和证明力 ,采取现代自由心证的方法 ,当庭认证 ,同时还必须建立法官严格甄选、独立审判、认证公开、认证异议和科学周密的证据规则等制度予以保障。     

香港证监会执法机制评介

20世纪70年代开始,香港证券监管体制从纯粹的自律监管向法定监管转变,并以2003年《证券及期货条例》为标志,完成了对证券监管相关法律制度的整合。作为证券监管的核心环节,香港证券行政执法制度也逐渐走向成熟。香港证监会执法流程包括立案、调查、处分、检控等相关制度,以市场失当行为审裁处为其特色性安排。     

Sino-Japanese Energy Security and Regional Stability: The Case of the East China Sea Gas Exploration

The Sino-Japanese dispute over the East China Sea maritime resources was triggered by the unsettled maritime boundary and the territorial dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. The dispute has been ascribed by many to intensified competition between China and Japan over energy supply. However this article attributes the fundamental cause of the conflict to power politics and political distrust, which are deemed to have the key role in preventing the two governments from finding a solution. The article analyses the origin and the causes responsible for the Sino-Japanese dispute over the East China Sea gas exploration, and then proceeds to investigate the diplomatic dialogues to reveal the key obstacles in the process.

自认证据化:表征、法理辨正与矫正路径

民事诉讼中的自认在规范层面及实务层面经常被降格为某种“证据”加以运用。自认证据化的程序设定成因在于我国自认的形式、阶段及对象均较为宽泛,导致自认与证据等心证来源混杂。自认证据化并不契合自认制度的理论根据和程序机能。基于民事诉讼诚实信用原则所导出的真实义务、法官心证原则以及虚假自认损害第三人利益之结果,仅能否定少数特定情形下的自认具有刚性拘束力,这也契合辩论主义之意蕴,并能与自认撤销制度相协调。据此,应在限缩自认程序设定的前提下普遍确立自认的刚性拘束力,在此基础上列举否定自认效力的例外情形。