缅甸形势和云南桥头堡建设

缅甸形势正在经历深刻、复杂的变化,尤其是政治生态的多元化、民主进程的发展和民族关系的发展变化,必然反映到它的对外关系包括与中国的关系上,影响到桥头堡建设。发展中缅关系,推进云南桥头堡建设应该有新的思路。     

China's Grand Strategy Seen from the Report to the CPC 18th National Congress

Clash of Opinions
Opinions vary over the question： ＂Does Beijing have a strategy. Both affirmative and negative answers have been heard. Witness the arguments for and against. The pros point to Mao Zedong＇s Ping-Pong diplomacy that shook the world by moving a big ball with a small one; Deng Xiaoping＇s Theory on reform and opening up, as well as his Three-Stage Development Strategy; and China＇s adherence to the path of peaceful development. Any one of these can be regarded as a grand strategy. On the con side, however, comes this sarcastic retort.＇ Just look at how the Middle Kingdom is kept constantly on the run responding to emergencies in foreign affairs without any internal coordination to speak of or any systemic approach to turn to. Is this not an eloquent testimony to the lack of a grand strategy？ Echoing this view, the former Australian prime minister, Kevin Rudd, in his recent article,     

Above the Roof,Beneath the Law: Perceived Justice behind Disruptive Tactics of Migrant Wage Claimants in China

The way in which citizens in developing countries conceptualize legality is a critical but understudied question for legal consciousness and legal mobilization studies. Drawing on participatory observations and extensive interviews from western China, this article explores the subjective interpretations of migrant wage claimants on law and justice behind their disruptive actions. Their perception of justice differs starkly from what the law stipulates as target, evidence and proper procedures. Who shall be held responsible? What constitutes evidence? When shall they be paid? How much? Their perceptions also differ from the attitude “against the law” found among members from disadvantaged social groups in the United States. The Chinese case of legal perception is shaped by the moral precepts ingrained in the culture, and more importantly, by the lopsided relationship between migrant workers and the political and business elite. It thus points to the daunting barriers in channeling the ever‐growing number of social conflicts into court.     

关于创新社区党建领导体制与工作机制的思考——以广西为例

新形势下创新社区党建体制机制,必须深化战略认识,把社区党建纳入各级党委重要议事El程;改革领导体制,强化党在社区的领导核心作用;优化组织设置,着力扩大社区党建工作覆盖面;完善分类管理机制,规范党员教育管理;构建人才物质保障机制,夯实党组织工作基础;创新服务群众工作机制,密切党同人民群众的血肉联系。     

Dilemmas of pluralist development and democratization in China

This article argues that the Western concept of pluralism, with some qualifications, can be applied to Chinese cultural, economic and political development, analyses the dilemmas of the reform process so far, and evaluates future possibilities. It examines the formation and limitations of cultural and economic pluralism, and their significance for party pluralism in China. The new ‘arts of rule’ that have been employed by the Chinese government to reconcile diversity and plurality with unity and stability, are also outlined.     

发展权:人权实现与发展的保障

发展权作为不可剥夺的人权,是参与特殊发展进程的权利.发展权概念的提出,是人权发展史上第一次赋予了人权以动态发展的理念,是人们对发展的涵义由单纯经济发展到以人为核心的综合发展的认识结果,消解了消极人权与积极人权之间的对立关系.发展权具有集体权利与个体权利相统一、连带性与整体性相统一、过程与结果相统一的特点.发展权谋求以人的发展为核心的全面、和谐的发展,谋求发展机遇的均等权,谋求可持续的发展,谋求发展的制度设计与制度保障.发展权是以生存权与主权为前提与基础的.     

地方政府提升本地区对海外高层次人才吸引力研究———基于服务质量差距模型

通过调查海外高层次人才并对调查数据进行因子分析,发现创、业环境和政府诚信度凶子、城市实力因子、生活环境因子和城市了解度因子是影响海外高层次人才选择回国工作地点的四个最主要因素。为了缩小公共服务质量感知差距以提升本地区对海外高层次人才的吸引力,地方政府要了解海外高层次人才对公共服务质量的期望,选择正确的公共服务设计并制定科学的公共服务质量标准,按照公共服务质量标准提供服务,保证地方政府公共服务传递与承诺相一致。     

放火罪与故意杀人罪关系新论

通说认为,放火罪和故意杀人罪是法条竞合关系,但无力解释为何放火罪未造成重伤以上结果的法定刑轻于故意杀人罪的法定刑。为追求罪刑相适应,以杀人故意实施放火行为,又危害公共安全的,成立放火罪与故意杀人罪想象竞合犯的观点逐渐占据优势。但放火罪中的致人死亡包括故意杀人,这表明放火罪能够包含杀人的故意与致人死亡的结果,并不符合想象竞合的适用前提。事实上,罪刑失衡的质疑不成立,特别法是重法时,普通法的量刑应当受到特别法的限制。未造成重伤以上后果的故意杀人行为的量刑本应受放火罪法定刑的限制,处3年以上10年以下有期徒刑。     

发挥民主党派对权力运行的监督作用

民主党派对共产党的权力运行进行监督既是民主党派的重要职能,也是多党合作的重要形式。针对民主党派对权力运行监督中存在的主要问题,我们要提高民主党派的政党意识,健全对权力运行的监督机制,增加民主党派担任实职的机会。只有充分发挥民主党派对权力运行的监督作用,才能让权力在阳光下运行,才能正确用好权力这把"双刃剑"。     

法条竞合该往何处去——以交通肇事罪与过失致人重伤、死亡罪关系为例

法条竞合的研究主要是探寻与想象竞合如何区分,这不仅是理论问题,更是实践课题。遗憾的是,各种学说的混乱,法条竞合适用已然"伤痕累累"。试图建立起法条竞合的城堡,一劳永逸的阻挡想象竞合的侵犯并不可行。归本溯源,法条竞合存在的价值在于维护罪刑法定,要求司法最大程度的尊重立法,限制想象竞合的滥用。因此,不能再拘泥于法条竞合内涵的完善与统一,应当转变视角,追求一种共识即新的路径:基于罪刑法定,构成要件符合的常识性判断是司法的基础,合理怀疑排斥想象竞合的适用。