社会转型期共青团凸显的内在矛盾及对策

进入社会转型期后,共青团的组织主体、组织力量和社会地位,以及青年群体的社会结构、利益诉求、价值取向和行为方式等都在持续地发生变化,团组织一些曾经有效的工作方式也渐渐失去了其积极效用,产生了不和谐、矛盾或冲突,团组织自身内在的矛盾不断凸显。因此,能否有效地认清并成功解决团组织内在的矛盾,将成为团组织能否适应政治体制改革、促进团组织持续发展以及赢得广大青年支持的一个关键。一、团组织的群团性质与政府职能之间未契合,主要表现为团组织越来越难以有效地提供公共服务产品。为此,团组织应在确保现有格局的基础上,积极振动建…     

今日俄罗斯哲学与俄罗斯的社会变革

热爱哲学思维是俄罗斯民族的特点之一,俄罗斯哲学也有着辉煌的历史。但是,20世纪90年代以来,急剧的社会变革使俄罗斯哲学处于十分尴尬的境地,当前俄罗斯哲学正处于适应这种变革的全面转型过程。     

理智取代激情冷静但不冷淡——"中国与非洲共同发展"国际学术研讨会会议纪要

中非合作论坛北京峰会(下称“北京峰会”)虽已落下帷幕,但许多领域,尤其是学术界对中非合作的论题却在以学者特有的客观、公允、冷静的眼光,探寻中非关系的新视角。在此背景下,2006年12月18~19日,“中国与非洲共同发展”国际学术研讨会在中国社会科学院召开。此次会议由中国社会科学院国际合作局、中国社会科学院西亚非洲研究所和英国国际发展部联合主办。来自非洲国家的驻华使节、中国外交部、商务部等政府相关部门的领导、国内外非洲问题专家学者近百人欣然与会。18日上午,研讨会开幕式在友好而简捷的气氛中举行。中国社会科学院副院长李…     

Vicarious Trauma in Judges: The Personal Challenge of Dispensing Justice

Symptoms of vicarious trauma, coping strategies, and prevention suggestions were investigated with 105 judges. Participants completed a self‐report measure developed for this study. The majority of judges (63%) reported one or more symptoms that they identified as work‐related vicarious trauma experiences. Female judges reported more symptoms, as did judges with seven or more years of experience. In addition, female judges were more likely to report internalizing difficulties, while judges with more experience reported higher levels of externalizing/hostility symptoms. Coping and prevention strategies were multi‐domain (i.e., personal, professional, and societal) and underscored the need for greater awareness and support for judges.     

Church,State, Resistance1

This article problematizes a separation of Church and State that is nevertheless identified as constitutive of politics. Democracy has come to manifest a tension between the ‘autonomy’ of the political and a ‘heteronomy’ that, exceeding rationalist or social contractarian accounts of our co‐existence, is here presented as an irreducible affect of our being together. Autonomy, it is argued, resists heteronomy through all representations of democracy; yet, by contrast, heteronomy resists autonomy, and does so with the force of this affect. So if civil religion is impossible – and if we know only too well where its realizations lead: by default, to republican celebration, or by excess, to fascism – then we must take up again, and from scratch, the question of the affect according to which we co‐exist.     

法律判断形成的事实认知

法律判断是在事实与规范之间形成的,以往关于规范层面的著述较多,而对事实认知的探讨却很少。法律事实的形成需要规范指导,但规范指导下的事实认知,又容易使事实变形;从个案事实中可以抽取法律规范所需要的要素,但只能使事实变得抽象,而不能让事实偏离真实;规范可以赋予事实以意义,但不应为迎合规范的适用,而使事实偏离本来面目。