稳态社会对于实现发展的意义探究

本文从稳态及稳态社会的解析探究了稳态社会能够实现发展之＂源＂;从稳态社会与发展的关系探究了稳态社会能够实现发展之＂原＂。从稳态社会对社会控制的要求探究了能够实现发展之＂路＂。     

排污权交易制度公平之思考

作为一种以市场为基础的经济政策和经济刺激手段,排污权交易是利用市场机制提高环境资源的配置效率以解决环境外部性问题的,其追求的直接价值目标是效率。但排污权交易以资源的稀缺性为前提,以交易市场的形成和交易规则的确立为关键,这些都从根本上体现了环境公平的内在需求。排污权交易制度中的环境公平包含了代内和代际公平的多重内容。在具体制度设计上,作为分配基础的总量控制制度使后代人环境权益的享有得到保障,而排污许可制度和市场交易规则保证了排污企业在对当代份额内排污权分配上的公平。政府权力约束机制、环境监测制度等则从其他层面促进公平价值的实现。     

国际金融危机下中国房地产业发展与调整的再思考

席卷全球的国际金融危机对中国房地产业健康发展具有一定的警示作用。中国房地产业正逐渐显露出“透支式”特征;这种“透支式”发展模式会产生诸多危害。以国际金融危机为契机,加大房地产业调控力度,不仅不会产生“雪崩效应”,反而会促使房地产业走向健康的发展道路。     

刑事程序中的技术侦查研究

现代世界各国均重视科学技术手段在刑事侦查中的运用 ,我国立法也规定了技术侦查。本文就具有代表性的两种技术侦查 ,即测谎检查和秘密录音录象等的运用进行了研究 ,并就其适用范围、条件、程序及所获得的材料的使用提出了立法建议。     

智慧城市治理的研究进展与前沿热点 ——基于中国知网数据库的文献计量可视化分析

随着城市治理形势的复杂化与信息通信技术的深度影响,智慧城市的治理问题关乎其效能的可持续发展。基于中国知网数据库中智慧城市治理相关文献,运用文献计量软件CiteSpace与VOS viewer,对2010-2020年间国内该领域的研究演进趋势、研究热点进行可视化分析。研究结果表明:第一,国内对于智慧城市治理的研究可分为三阶段,从关注智慧城市新形态到研究城市主体的应用实践,再到探索智慧城市的全局规划;第二,国内智慧城市治理的研究内容可分为智慧城市的建设途径、技术支撑以及实践应用三大类。在此基础上,归纳出新型智慧城市、城市治理中的人工智能技术、公共安全管理智慧化等未来研究方向,为推进城市治理能力现代化提供理论参考。     

Genetic polymorphisms and phylogenetic analyses of the Ü-Tsang Tibetan from Lhasa based on 30 slowly and moderately mutated Y-STR loci

As a result of the expansion of old Tibet on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Tibetans diverged into three main branches, Ü-Tsang, Amdo, and Kham Tibetan. Ü-Tsang Tibetans are geographically distributed across the wide central and western portions of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau while Lhasa is the central gathering place for Tibetan culture. The AGCU Y30, a 6-dye fluorescence kit including 30 slowly and moderately mutated Y-STR loci, has been validated for its stability and sensitivity in different biomaterials and diverse Chinese populations (Han and other minorities), and widely used in the practical work of forensic science. However, the 30 Y-STR profiling of Tibetan, especially for Ü-Tsang Tibetan, were insufficient. We utilized the AGCU Y30 to genotype 577 Ü-Tsang Tibetan unrelated males from Lhasa in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China to fill up the full and accurate Y-STR profiles. A total of 552 haplotypes were observed, 536 (97.10%) of which were unique. One hundred and ninety-four alleles were observed at 26 single copy loci and the allelic frequencies ranged from 0.0017 to 0.8180. For the two multi-copy loci DYS385a/b and DYS527a/b, 64 and 36 allelic combinations were observed, respectively. The gene diversity (GD) values ranged from 0.3079 at DYS391 to 0.9142 at DYS385a/b and the overall haplotype diversity (HD) was 0.9998, and its discrimination capacity (DC) was 0.9567. The population genetic analyses demonstrated that Lhasa Ü-Tsang Tibetan had close relationships with other Tibetan populations from Tibet and Qinghai, especially with Ü-Tsang Tibetan. From the perspective of Y haplogroups, the admixture of the southward Qiang people with dominant haplogroup O-M122 and the northward migrations of the initial settlers of East Asia with haplogroup D-M175 hinted the Sino-Tibetan homologous, thus, we could not ignore the gene flows with other Sino-Tibetan populations, especially for Han Chinese, to characterize the forensic genetic landscape of Tibetan.     

美国亚太战略中的地缘政治考量

美国作为具有深厚地缘政治思想传统的大国,其亚太战略无论是宏观的指导思想还是微观的具体政策,都无法隐匿其中的地缘政治考量。当前,美国深受＂亚洲两大全球性强国的崛起＂这一重大地缘政治事态的影响,结果使亚太地区成为它实现和维持其世界领导地位的关键地区。据此,美国全方位加大对亚太地区的战略投入,其防范和针对中国的一面更加明显。     

程序与程序保障

法律程序是法律制度的实践基础,在结构上可以区分为程序规则、程序行为两个组成部分。程序行为是法定的要式行为,程序规则是不同于实体法律规则的构成性规则。程序保障,或说权利的程序保障,是现代法律程序的基本原则,也是现代法律程序有别于前现代法律程序的标志。正是程序保障原则赋予了现代法律程序独立于实体法律而存在的制度空间。     

马克思的意识形态理论与历史唯物主义

马克思仅仅把那些掩盖现实社会矛盾的思想、观念视为意识形态.马克思从早期一般意义上的意识形态分析转向中后期对资本主义特定的意识形态(物化)的批判,揭示了意识形态掩盖下的生产领域中的资本与劳动、人与人之间的真实关系.马克思的整个意识形态理论是历史唯物主义的(尤其是历史性的),是资本主义社会的一种自我认识.     

Democracy and noncitizen voting rights

The boundaries of democracy are typically defined by the boundaries of formal status citizenship. Such state-centered theories of democracy leave many migrants without a voice in political decision-making in the areas where they live and work, giving rise to a problem of democratic legitimacy. Drawing on two democratic principles of inclusion, the all affected interests and coercion principles, this article elaborates this problem and examines two responses offered by scholars of citizenship for what receiving states might do. The first approach involves expanding the circle of citizenship to include resident noncitizens. A second approach involves disaggregating the rights conventionally associated with citizenship from the legal status of citizenship and extending some of those rights, including voting rights, to resident noncitizens. This article argues that both approaches fall short of satisfying the democratic principles of inclusion, which call for enfranchising individuals not only beyond the boundaries of citizenship but also beyond territorial boundaries.