Harsh Discipline and Child Problem Behaviors: The Roles of Positive Parenting and Gender

This study examined harsh verbal and physical discipline and child problem behaviors in a community sample of 2,582 parents and their fifth and sixth grade children. Participants were recruited from pediatric practices, and both parents and children completed questionnaire packets. The findings indicated that boys received more harsh verbal and physical discipline than girls, with fathers utilizing more harsh physical discipline with boys than did mothers. Both types of harsh discipline were associated with child behavior problems uniquely after positive parenting was taken into account. Child gender did not moderate the findings, but one dimension of positive parenting (i.e., parental warmth) served to buffer children from the detrimental influences of harsh physical discipline. The implications of the findings for intervention programs are discussed. This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.     

Wasserentnahmeentgelt und erlaubnisfreier Eigentümergebrauch am Beispiel der Kieswäsche

Das nordrhein-westf?lische Wasserentnahmeentgeltgesetz – WasEG NRW – hat eine Vielzahl von Fragen aufgeworfen. Unternehmen der Kies- und Sandindustrie waschen das gef?rderte Rohmaterial in der Regel mit Wasser, das sie aus dem durch die Gewinnungst?tigkeit entstehenden Abgrabungsgew?sser entnehmen und nach Gebrauch wieder einleiten. Der „Wassercent“ belastet einzelne Unternehmen mit j?hrlich bis zu 1,0 Mio. Unter dem Druck des abgabenrechtlichen Zugriffs erf?hrt ein bisher wenig beachtetes Instrument Aufmerksamkeit: Der erlaubnisfreie Eigentümergebrauch. Als Eigentümergebrauch w?re die Kiesw?sche erlaubnis- und damit auch entgeltfrei. Nachdem sich die Festsetzungsbeh?rde2 – aus vorgeblich ?kologischen überlegungen – gegen die Anerkennung der Kiesw?sche als Eigentümergebrauch positioniert hat, befasst sich nunmehr auch die Rechtsprechung mit der Frage, sodass eine erste Bilanz geboten ist.     

Interagency implementation of government policy: Strategic management of maternal and child health care in texas

Focusing on a joint effort of the Texas Department of Health and the Texas Department of Human Services, this study examined the interagency implementation of maternal and infant health policy in the state. Thompson's typology of implementation⁽¹⁾ was integrated with the Montjoy and O’Toole⁽²⁾ model of overhead influence on intraorganizational factors in public policy implementation for analysis. The findings provide some support to the Montjoy and O’Toole model.⁽³⁾ The data suggested Type A Mandate Effects and Expected Activity for both departmental programs. Reciprocal Operating Interdependence existed between the two state departments.     

论欧盟管辖权:从“纵向”视角看欧盟多层级体系

从一开始,欧洲一体化就是指权力由民族国家层面向欧盟层面的让渡,它演变为各国政府之间在台面上的议价,或是一种渐变。随着欧盟管辖权这一议题被摆上欧盟宪政的议程,一体化过程被再造。现在它涉及到欧盟多层级政体的整体架构,尤其涉及不同层级之间权力是如何配置、界定以及相互关联的。本文总结了关于欧盟和成员国的国家与次国家层面之间相互关系的研究成果,尤其是关于多层级政治体制中管辖权的演变和分割的研究成果。为此,本文概述了管辖权适当配置的规范性理由、用以解释权力的有效结构的实证理论以及相关的实证研究成果。     

Book reviews

Tetsuya Kataoka, The Price of a Constitution: The Origin of Japan's Postwar Politics New York: Crane Russak, 1991, 237 pp.

Denis Lacorne, Jacques Rupnik, and Marie‐France Toinet, eds., The Rise and Fall of Anti‐Americanism: A Century of French Perception (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1990), 258p.     

Forensic Neuropsychology and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Over the last 20 years, the Courts and the legal community have increasingly relied on neuropsychologists to provide opinions, guidance, and expertise in the area of brain–behavior relationships. The purpose of this article is to review issues neuropsychologists commonly face when asked to evaluate cases with suspected mild traumatic brain injuries (TBI) in the civil or criminal legal context. In particular, we will discuss: (a) the neuropsychologist’s role in TBI forensic cases, (b) the attorney’s role in forensic TBI cases, (c) a neuropsychological framework to approach forensic mild TBI cases, (d) establishing working relationships with attorneys, (e) the Daubert and Frye standards, (f) symptom validity, (g) ethical issues, and (h) recommendations to improve the ecological validity of our tests and encourage test developers to provide alternate forms of tests.     

Are Just-World Beliefs Compatible with Justifying Inequality? Collective Political Efficacy as a Moderator

Previous research demonstrates that the belief in a just world is often accompanied by the justification of social inequality and by low socio-political participation (e.g., Jost and Hunyady, Curr Direct Psychol Sci 14:260–265, 2005). However, studies provide evidence that the relations may be moderated by individual differences such as a person’s self-efficacy expectations to promote justice and equality (Mohiyeddini and Montada, Responses to victimization and belief in a just world, 1998). At the societal level, collective political efficacy has consistently been found to foster political participation (cf. Lee, Int J Public Opin Res 22:392–411, 2010). In our study, we tested whether collective political efficacy may attenuate the negative social impact of the belief in a just world: It is predicted that when collective political efficacy is low, a strong belief in a just world would increase the motivation to justify inequality. By contrast, when collective political efficacy is high, the belief in a just world would not increase, but potentially decrease the motivation to justify inequality. In turn, justification of inequality is expected to negatively affect socio-political participation. Data from 150 university students were analyzed using moderated structural equation modeling. In our study, the expected moderating effect of collective political efficacy on the relation between belief in a just world and justification of inequality was established empirically. When collective political efficacy was high, justification of inequality did not inevitably increase with the belief in a just world. In addition, the impact of belief in a just world on justice-promoting behavior was mediated by justification of inequality. Implications for theory and future research are discussed.     

TV tip-over morbidity and mortality in children

Twenty-eight non-fatal cases of TV related injuries were noted in San Diego in the 2 years prior to September 2008. We reviewed the scene, witness reports, past history, and autopsy findings from three fatal cases and distinguished them from abusive head trauma. The recent literature was also reviewed. Our fatal cases resulted from TVs falling on small children and causing severe head injury. The literature review showed increasing injuries and deaths relating to TV tip-over, TV stands and dressers. Most of the fatalities were head injuries in small children. The reporting methods may not be complete or accurate. Some authors in the literature review suggested preventive measures so as to decrease these injuries. Forensic scientists should become familiar with these injuries and measures so that they may communicate effectively with their communities.     

Action research with children and adolescents working on the streets of Athens,Greece

In fieldwork with children and adolescents working on the streets of Athens, Greece, the authors applied a multidisciplinary methodology, through which participants were empowered to articulate their own voice. This article discusses some indicant themes which emerged through participants' narrations and through their active engagement in Theatre-for-Development: (1) the role of family attachment and social networks promoting the continuity of children's cultural identity; (2) their perception of working on the streets as a vital need to contribute to family income; and (3) the way young subjects resituated themselves both in their relation with the mainstream culture and within their own culture.     

An Antipodean History of Interpretation

In this paper, we explore the connections between intepretivism's core and its peripheries in both geographical and epistemological terms, by tracing the relationship between interpretivism and Australian political scholarship. In this task, we draw on some of the most celebrated and influential work on Australian politics—by political scientists but before them historians and anthropologists—to show how the approach typically undertaken by these researchers echoes key tenets of interpretivism, especially through an interest in subjective beliefs and experiences, a desire to uncover and bring to life richly contextualised detail, and a commitment to the abductive linking of theory and practice. As such, we suggest that the spread of this counter identity to interpretive researchers in Australia risks manufacturing a sense of methodological antipathy, marginalising the work of interpretivists from mainstream political scholarship.