The Politics of the Green New Deal

Covid-19 has highlighted our fragile relationship with the planet. But it represents a minor challenge compared to the permanent havoc that runaway climate change threatens. Politicians and governments—some at least—are beginning to recognise the scale of the danger. In this article we assess the evolution of policy thinking on how to make climate transitions happen; the potential of the European Green Deal; and how progressives need to shape it and any UK counterpart to meet the challenges of modern society. The European initiative arises from a broad coalition spanning the political spectrum. Yet, its central thrust of active government offers the prospect of reviving a battered social democracy. We indicate the openings here for a pluralist, ecological left. The run-up to the next global climate conference—COP26—will be a vital period which will show whether parties and governments across the world are prepared to meet the climate change challenge.     

Mapping the Approaches to the Question of Exemption from International Responsibility

Netherlands International Law Review - García Amador, the first Special Rapporteur on the topic of state responsibility, was of the view that in international law, special circumstances denote...     

Brownfield redevelopment and affordable housing: A case study of New Jersey

Abstract

A total of 779 New Jersey residents were surveyed to determine the number of people who during the next five years would be willing to move to housing built on brownfield sites that have been remediated to the extent that they pose no plausible brownfield‐related health risk to residents.

Fourteen percent of the respondents said they would be willing to move to and live in housing built on cleaned‐up brownfields. These respondents were disproportionately relatively poor and young and resided in apartments and cities, especially cities where the city government was actively promoting brownfields. These respondents also did not like their current neighborhoods, did not feel threatened by the idea of living on a cleaned‐up brownfield site, and trusted experts to advise them on the health risks involved.     

Subjectivity in sentencing

The present paper describes a model of choice behavior based on a combination of personal construct theory and multiattribute utility theory. This model has been applied to the sentencing of offenders by magistrates with a high degree of success. The data collected from magistrates are also used to indicate extent of agreement in sentencing and to illustrate problems associated with verbal measures of construct similarity. Finally, it is suggested that the model has a wide range of application in both legal and nonlegal contexts.