排序方式: 共有31条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
21.
Much confusion has revolved around the nature of the publicpolicy defense under Article V(2)(b) of United Nations Conventionon the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards (the NewYork Convention) to the point that the French term for publicpolicy, ordre public, ought to be changed to désordrepublic to reflect the general disorder in the discourse on thisparticular subject. This article takes an in-depth look at thepublic policy defense and challenges the notion that enforcementStates are obliged to consider supranational public policy whendeciding whether to recognize or enforce an international arbitralaward, except in only a few cases where certain regional obligationsare involved. Even then, this is not the type of truly internationalpublic policy that is advocated by numerous commentators. Nonetheless,States are free to rely on truly international public policywhen deciding on enforcement. Despite the perceived benefitsto relying on truly international public policy, there are significantreasons to refrain from pushing for such reliance. While relianceon truly international public policy may help mitigate someof the adverse side effects associated with globalization, itis important to ask what is the price we are willing to payto counter these side effects. The price should not be the emasculationof the New York Convention itself. 相似文献
22.
Felson Richard B. Savolainen Jukka Fry Sarah Whichard Corey Ellonen Noora 《Journal of youth and adolescence》2019,48(10):1869-1882
Journal of Youth and Adolescence - To understand the etiology and consequences of child sexual abuse it is important to study the victims’ subjective reactions to such incidents. Because... 相似文献
23.
Vanessa Crossgrove Fry 《Public administration review》2019,79(5):784-790
Across the United States, communities struggle with numerous social and environmental issues, while the funding to address these issues continues to diminish. Therefore, actors inside and outside of government are seeking new policy solutions to persistent social problems. Significant hurdles to new policies exist, however, including a lack of funding and a reluctance to take on the risks inherent in implementing new programs. A recent innovation in the policy sphere, pay‐for‐success (PFS) financing, has been able to overcome these hurdles. Policy innovation does not come easily, though, and change within government is often slow and methodical. What catalyzes jurisdictions to engage with PFS? By developing an understanding of the mechanisms and processes of PFS, diffusion scholars and practitioners can facilitate innovation within jurisdictions. Such innovation, which the federal government has an opportunity to facilitate, is necessary to shift business‐as‐usual service provision and enable greater social, environmental, and economic stability. 相似文献
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
Fry S 《The American criminal law review》1986,24(1):166-191
29.
30.