Impact of parental holocaust traumatization on offsprings' reports of parental child-rearing practices

The impact of severe parental traumatization on child rearing was investigated in a nonselective nonclinical group of Israeli adolescents, offspring of Holocaust survivors (N=76). Adolescents' reports of parental behavior were correlated with a measure of severity of parental Holocaust traumatization. For boys, the severity of paternal traumatization (PT) correlated negatively with reported child-rearing practices denoting both paternal nurturance and paternal control. Mothers were perceived by boys as withholding nurturance and exerting hostile control as a function of their spouses' degree of traumatization (PT). Females perceived fathers as being inconsistent socializers, with anxiety-provoking and enforcement overtones as a function of PT. PT is, however, uncorrelated with any maternal practices as reported by girls. The severity of maternal traumatization (MT) was correlated with fathers' refrainment with girls from harsh modes, such as control, hostile control, and instilling anxiety. MT correlated for boys with maternal refrainment from harsh child-rearing practices, such as hostile control and enforcement. The results clearly point to the existence of significant associations between degree of parental traumatization and reported child-rearing experiences. The pattern of correlations indicate specific intragender and intergender transgenerational interactions.Received his Ph.D. at Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1976. Fulbright scholar in Child Development at UCLA (1977). Major interests are personality assessment, personality development, and transgenerational aftermath of holocaust traumatization.Received his M.D. at Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany, in 1952. Major interests are problems of trauma, mourning and bereavement, transgenerational transmission of identity in families, and psychoanalytic aspects of historical processes.     

Institutional law and economics

Behavioral economics provides one of the foundation for institutional law and economics (ILE). Improvement in predicting the performance of alternative laws will be built on ILE insights into how distribution affects productivity of labor and realization of joint gains. Our understanding of obedience to law as well as other categories of failure to be opportunistic (such as in high exclusion-cost situations) will be better understood from an ILE perspective that investigates learning to supplement specific sanctions.The boundaries of ILE inquiry encompass private property rights, regulation, and public spending and taxation since these are complements and substitutes. Public spending is not a good measure of the size of government, and regulation is not the opposite of freedom in the aggregate. This framework of ILE can usefully be seen as distinctive, even if all of its practitioners do not use the label and several of its propositions are shared with other paradigms. A better label might simply be institutional economics or political economy.     

All Bark and No Bite: Notes on the Federal Constitutional Court's 'Banana Decision'

The Federal Constitutional Court's banana decision of 7 June 2000 continues the complex theme of national fundamental‐rights control over Community law. Whereas in the ‘Solange II’ decision (BVerfGE 73, 339) the Federal Constitutional Court had lowered its standard of review to the general guarantee of the constitutionally mandatorily required minimum, the Maastricht judgment (BVerfGE 89, 155) had raised doubts as to the continued validity of this case law. In the banana decision, which was based on the submission of the EC banana market regulation by the Frankfurt‐am‐Main administrative court for constitutional review, the Federal Constitutional Court has now confirmed the ‘Solange II’decision and restrictively specified the admissibility conditions for constitutional review of Community law as follows. Constitutional complaints and judicial applications for review of European legislation alleging fundamental‐rights infringements are inadmissible unless they show that the development of European law including Court of Justice case law has since the ‘Solange II’ decision generally fallen below the mandatorily required fundamental‐rights standard of the Basic Law in a given field. This would require a comprehensive comparison of European and national fundamental‐rights protection. This paper criticises this formula as being logically problematic and scarcely compatible with the Basic Law. Starting from the position that national constitutional courts active even in European matters should be among the essential vertical ‘checks and balances’ in the European multi‐level system, a practical alternative to the Federal Constitutional Court's retreat is developed. This involves at the first stage a submission by the Federal Constitutional Court to the Court of Justice, something that in the banana case might have taken up questions on the method of fundamental‐rights review and the internal Community effect of WTO dispute settlement decisions. Should national constitutional identity not be upheld even by this, then at a second stage, as ultima ratio taking recourse to general international law, the call is made for the decision of constitutional conflicts by an independent mediating body.     

Überlegungen zur Einführung eines Grundrechts auf Betreten der Natur in die österreichische Rechtsordnung

Das Betreten und der Aufenthalt in der Natur sind in Österreich eine Selbstverständlichkeit. Ein Blick auf die rechtlichen Grundlagen offenbart allerdings eine Diskrepanz zwischen tatsächlicher Übung und Rechtsordnung, die die Juristerei seit einem Jahrhundert beschäftigt. Die folgenden Überlegungen thematisieren erstmals die Möglichkeit, den Erholungs suchenden in Österreich ein verfassungsgesetzlich gewährleistetes Recht einzuräumen. Ausgehend von einem konkreten Formulierungsvorschlag geht es um den möglichen Inhalt eines derartigen Grundrechts und darum, wie ein Ausgleich mit anderen geschützten Rechtspositionen gefunden werden kann.     

Konsens und Gewalt. Zur handlungstheoretischen Modellierung sozialer Mechanismen der Normentstehung

Der Aufsatz untersucht die Möglichkeit, handlungstheoretisch fundierte Modelle über Abstimmungsmechanismen zu entwickeln, mittels derer Akteure die Koordinations-, Kooperations- und Ungleichheitsdilemmata überwinden können, denen ihre Beziehungsverhältnisse ausgesetzt sind. Es zeigt sich, dass die bislang diskutierten soziologischen und ökonomischen Modellierungsvorschläge Mängel aufweisen, die dadurch behoben werden können, dass man die Etablierung und Durchsetzung von (normativen und zugleich rechtswirksamen) Regeln, welche die Akteure auf die Rücksichtnahme der Interessen anderer verpflichten, als eine notwendige Bedingung der Stabilisierung zwischenmenschlicher Beziehungsformen in die Modellierungen aufnimmt. Ergebnis dieser Modellerweiterung ist die Einsicht, dass es keine ultrastabilen Lösungen für die genannten Abstimmungsprobleme gibt. Da alle sozialwissenschaftlichen Disziplinen derartige Abstimmungsmechanismen behandeln, wäre deren interdisziplinäre Erforschung anzuraten, die auf der Basis einer einheitlichen, fächerübergreifenden Theorie des menschlichen Wahlhandelns vorangetrieben werden kann.     

Theories of Rights: Is There a Third Way?

Some important recent articles, including one in this journal,have sought to devise theories of rights that can transcendthe longstanding debate between the Interest Theory and theWill Theory. The present essay argues that those efforts failand that the Interest Theory and the Will Theory withstand thecriticisms that have been levelled against them. To be sure,the criticisms have been valuable in that they have promptedthe amplification and clarification of the two dominant theoriesof rights; but their upshot has been to reveal the need forthe improvement, rather than the abandonment, of those theories.     

Public choice in local judicial systems

For their contributions to earlier drafts, acknowledgements are extended to Webb Smathers, Ron Faas, Rod Ziemer and other reviewers.     

Allele frequencies of the ACTBP2 (=SE33), D18S51, D8S1132, D12S391, D2S1360, D3S1744, D5S2500, D7S1517, D10S2325 and D21S2055 loci in a German population sample

A population study on 10 tetrameric STR loci (ACTBP2 (=SE33), D18S51, D8S1132, D12S391, D2S1360, D3S1744, D5S2500, D7S1517, D10S2325, D21S2055) was performed with Germans from Bavaria.