UNEQUAL PARTNERS: THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES POLICIES IN WESTERN EUROPE

As a general principle, equality of opportunity attracts considerable support. However, such agreement does not extend to definitions of equal opportunity policies or to the need and manner for their implementation. These policies have a variety of both ideological and historical aspects, and patterns of implementation are politically and culturally conditioned. To highlight different approaches to equal opportunity implementation, three countries are compared: France, the United Kingdom and Sweden. Indices of progress for women are presented and performances assessed, as are the instruments and mechanisms of implementation preferred under different regimes. In addition, the influence and actions of the European Community (EC) are considered. Three distinct but not mutually exclusive models of implementation are observed, each with particular benefits and drawbacks. Sweden emerges with the most sustained and effective public policy on equal opportunities, France demonstrates the value of a Ministry of Women, while the potential inherent in Britain's Equal Opportunities Commission and local authority endeavour is thwarted by a lack of political will at central government level.     

1992: THE ILLUSION OF CHANGE

Despite all the recent publicity surrounding the benefits of a 'Europe without frontiers' it would be wrong to assume that the attainment of this goal is a foregone conclusion. The 1992 deadline is a political expedient designed to create the impression that European economic integration is an irreversible process. However, the reality is that there is still a long way to go before Europe is truly 'open for business'. Barriers to trade will remain despite the enthusiasm of the Commission for radical change, because it is the member states who finally decide on the shape of new initiatives. In order to achieve agreement compromises have to be made, and this reduces the impact of reforms. The measures taken to complete that internal market of the EC can become exercises in harmonization rather than significant reforms which offer direct benefits to business. This article is concerned with one such exercise in harmonization, the introduction of the Single Administrative Document ( sad ).     

REPRESENTATIONS OF POLITICAL ARGUMENT: APPLICATIONS WITHIN META-PLANNING

Abstract. Central to the best-known classification of Political Arguments is a distinction between want-regarding and ideal-regarding principles, upon which this paper bases alternative representations of the dynamics of political debate. These are discussed with specific reference to the possibility that want-regarding goals are served less well by British planning decisions than if ideal-regarding arguments were permitted. The representations provide a limited explanation of how such a situation might come about and be maintained. Initially they draw on Downs'models of voting and party competition, but explore alternatives because of: (1) the possibility that some assumptions needed for a Downsian representation cannot realistically be made about political arguments; and (2) the probability that factors other than verbal arguments enter into planning decisions.